Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The last years of the decline of the Roman Republic up to the rise of the Roman Empire
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 7371476, member: 44316"]The trial is a great and important story of corruption tolerated by senators because they benefited by bribery or hoped to benefit by that same sort of (bad) behavior when they got a province to govern. </p><p><br /></p><p>Of course, the "Glabrio" of the coin from 49 BC is not the same Glabrio. A praetor in 70 BC would be far too old to be a moneyer in 49 BC. Crawford says of this type "The moneyer is perhaps Mn. Acilus Glabrio, sister's son to M. Aelilius Scarus, Pr. 56" and does not mention any connection with the Glabrio of the trial, although the name in common means they must be relatives of some sort. Harlan (<i>Roman Republican Moneyers and Their Coins 63 BC - 49 BC</i>) thinks the type is from 50 BC and SALVTIS refers to the near-fatal illness and eventual recovery of Pompey. </p><p><br /></p><p>Here is my example:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1284266[/ATTACH]</p><p>Man. Acilus Glabrio, 49 BC. </p><p>18 mm. 3.72 grams.</p><p>Sear 412; Crawford 442/1a.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 7371476, member: 44316"]The trial is a great and important story of corruption tolerated by senators because they benefited by bribery or hoped to benefit by that same sort of (bad) behavior when they got a province to govern. Of course, the "Glabrio" of the coin from 49 BC is not the same Glabrio. A praetor in 70 BC would be far too old to be a moneyer in 49 BC. Crawford says of this type "The moneyer is perhaps Mn. Acilus Glabrio, sister's son to M. Aelilius Scarus, Pr. 56" and does not mention any connection with the Glabrio of the trial, although the name in common means they must be relatives of some sort. Harlan ([I]Roman Republican Moneyers and Their Coins 63 BC - 49 BC[/I]) thinks the type is from 50 BC and SALVTIS refers to the near-fatal illness and eventual recovery of Pompey. Here is my example: [ATTACH=full]1284266[/ATTACH] Man. Acilus Glabrio, 49 BC. 18 mm. 3.72 grams. Sear 412; Crawford 442/1a.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The last years of the decline of the Roman Republic up to the rise of the Roman Empire
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...