Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The last GENIO POPVLI ROMANI
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Heliodromus, post: 8078528, member: 120820"]Here's one of those first post-reform GPRs. This is RIC VI Rome 45a for Diocletian from the mint of Rome.</p><p><br /></p><p>Diocletian's coinage reform, as well as introducing the nummus, made the coinage much more consistent across all mints. One of the changes was for all mints to identify their output by including a mintmark with the name of the mint. It seems the intention was for the mintmark to go at the bottom of the coin (in the exergue), but perhaps that wasn't clearly specified since Rome and Siscia instead chose to put it in the field on their initial issues.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1402415[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin is from Rome, as indicated by the "R" in field. It was actually sold as London, since the seller had only paid attention to the empty exergue!</p><p><br /></p><p>These first issue nummi mostly only indicate the mint, omitting any officina. It seems there must have been a follow-on order to add an officina letter as part of this new cross-mint standardization, since these then appear in subsequent issues.</p><p><br /></p><p>The mints of Antioch and Alexandria differ from the rest in starting production already with an officina, perhaps due to starting production a bit later when this follow-on order had been received.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Heliodromus, post: 8078528, member: 120820"]Here's one of those first post-reform GPRs. This is RIC VI Rome 45a for Diocletian from the mint of Rome. Diocletian's coinage reform, as well as introducing the nummus, made the coinage much more consistent across all mints. One of the changes was for all mints to identify their output by including a mintmark with the name of the mint. It seems the intention was for the mintmark to go at the bottom of the coin (in the exergue), but perhaps that wasn't clearly specified since Rome and Siscia instead chose to put it in the field on their initial issues. [ATTACH=full]1402415[/ATTACH] This coin is from Rome, as indicated by the "R" in field. It was actually sold as London, since the seller had only paid attention to the empty exergue! These first issue nummi mostly only indicate the mint, omitting any officina. It seems there must have been a follow-on order to add an officina letter as part of this new cross-mint standardization, since these then appear in subsequent issues. The mints of Antioch and Alexandria differ from the rest in starting production already with an officina, perhaps due to starting production a bit later when this follow-on order had been received.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The last GENIO POPVLI ROMANI
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...