Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 1880330, member: 37839&quot;]Missed typo---they are not more &quot;contrary,&quot; they are more contrasty.&nbsp; That is, as long as I feed and play with them often enough.&nbsp; Otherwise, they get ornery.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Seriously, the OP coin is very nice, but definitely not PL or deep mirrors--it is a nice, contrasty Morgan, with some cameo that is common to the early 1880 dates, and as I said previously, probably a 64.&nbsp; NOT a gem coin, but nice.&nbsp; I see NO evidence of a harsh cleaning that would keep it of a slab--the blue is a reflection of the cloth it is on, but why bother worrying about sending it in, as it is an extremely common date, in average uncirculated condition for a Morgan.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in