Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 1554781, member: 22331&quot;]<b>Hilarious!!!</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>I&#039;m sorry, but I just know there must be SLQ </b><b>collectors/afficianodos</b><b> with their eyes rolled back, after reading your declaration. It provided me with the best laughter I&#039;ve enjoyed in some time.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>The TPG have little consistency in grading this series of coins which has such great variations in strike. I&#039;ve loved collecting this coin through the high &quot;Gem&quot; grades where I can show TPG extreme variations in grading of even the same date/mint. TPG graded MS67 coins without one complete character in the date, very poor detail, no luster, improper FH designation, etc.. This is a coin design that can easily start grading arguments.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>I&#039;d really enjoy reading your grading standards, as I&#039;ve yet to locate exacting TPG standards, and know that the A.N.A. technical standards haven&#039;t been applied. I&#039;d appreciate your &quot;</b>easy peasy<b>&quot; grading sys</b><b>tem, as it may equal that used by the &quot;Pros&quot;. </b><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in