Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Guide Book/Red Book and your Queries
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Treashunt, post: 725342, member: 6763"]And here we go:</p><p><br /></p><p>The contributors, of which there are (in the current edition) about: 92, plus the editors, and others, as opposed to the original edition (1st edition, 1947) when there were 14 contributors.</p><p><br /></p><p>[client just came in, back soon.]</p><p><br /></p><p>Okay, back now:</p><p><br /></p><p>The editors (in the past, and still to this day) represent a corss section of the market in US Coins.</p><p>The meet and discuss each & every change to the book, those coins that are to be listed, those to be removed.</p><p><br /></p><p>One example is the 1894 S high & low S MM Barber $1/2.</p><p><br /></p><p>While writing & researching my book I asked Ken why this particular variety was removed from the book.</p><p>He stated that it was originally included because collectors actively collected it.</p><p>[Aside: it was included in the Wayte Raymond albums for Barber $1/2's.]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Times change and it was no longer considered to be a popular collectible.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for varieties, such as the 1955 DDO, it took some time to decide to include the variety. Basically, it is the collector and the demand for the coin that determines whether or not a variety is included or ignored.</p><p><br /></p><p>I know, not the best answer, but an honest one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Treashunt, post: 725342, member: 6763"]And here we go: The contributors, of which there are (in the current edition) about: 92, plus the editors, and others, as opposed to the original edition (1st edition, 1947) when there were 14 contributors. [client just came in, back soon.] Okay, back now: The editors (in the past, and still to this day) represent a corss section of the market in US Coins. The meet and discuss each & every change to the book, those coins that are to be listed, those to be removed. One example is the 1894 S high & low S MM Barber $1/2. While writing & researching my book I asked Ken why this particular variety was removed from the book. He stated that it was originally included because collectors actively collected it. [Aside: it was included in the Wayte Raymond albums for Barber $1/2's.] Times change and it was no longer considered to be a popular collectible. As for varieties, such as the 1955 DDO, it took some time to decide to include the variety. Basically, it is the collector and the demand for the coin that determines whether or not a variety is included or ignored. I know, not the best answer, but an honest one.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Guide Book/Red Book and your Queries
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...