Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NetJohn, post: 672455, member: 16715&quot;]Funny thing of the Internet: anyone can claim to be an expert, so one often has to be careful.&nbsp; I do not know Jamie nor his expertise, and while I hoped I came off non-confrontational with my discussion with him, I&#039;m also not doubting I came off defensive.</p><p><br /></p><p>Jamie, regardless of the your agreement to the &quot;mule&quot; category of the notes from 1957 through 1977A, I still hope I can get your (and others&#039;) help in this.&nbsp; I&#039;ve already acquired close to 600 back plates in the series, with some interesting finds.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, a 1969D with back plate 1472 was reported.&nbsp; This back plate is in the range for 1969B!&nbsp; Note that I haven&#039;t had a report of 1472 being on a 1969C or 1969B, so perhaps this plate was a late finisher?</p><p><br /></p><p>I also have reports of back plates 1129 and 1137 in the 1963A series, but these are in the range of the <b>LATE</b> 1963B notes.&nbsp; Interesting....</p><p><br /></p><p>Interesting to hear your comments on these findings.</p><p><br /></p><p>John[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in