Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 26007967, member: 15309&quot;]The reverse of 38 is much easier to get full steps.&nbsp; I expected #1 to be FS, and thought #2 had an outside chance.&nbsp; I have no idea why both services skunked #4, it looks like a cut and dry full steps to me.</p><p><br /></p><p>When I submit Jefferson Nickels, I almost always submit coins that have a shot at full steps.&nbsp; NGC gave me 1 full step coin out of 10, and the one they gave full steps to, they undergraded.&nbsp; A novice grader would look at the 41-D in hand and know that it was an MS67 5FS.&nbsp; The only coin I thought PCGS was hard on was #4, but considering what they did with #7 &amp; #8, I can&#039;t be anything but thrilled with the results.</p><p><br /></p><p>The worst part is that these 10 only represent the tip of the iceberg.&nbsp; We all know about the phantom wheel mark on my 1943/2-P that PCGS ended up grading MS66FS.&nbsp; Then there is the 1983-P MS68 5FS that they called a partial error making it ineligible for the registry.&nbsp; That coin is currently at PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Qg35hhq.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And this is to say nothing of the stack of MS67 war nickels that should have full steps but don&#039;t and I am leary of cracking them because I am not sure they will get MS67 from PCGS.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in