Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Future of Daniel Carr Overstrikes?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 2465487, member: 36230"]How am I insulting you? You implied what you do is perfectly acceptable for a "true artist", and I agreed; quit simple really. </p><p><br /></p><p>Even though I've no expectations that you'll admit reality (and I do understand why), the fact is the designs are copied. We can play our little semantics game if you'd like, but that's what they are. With the "overstrikes" in question, you did not simply incorporate certain past design elements into something of your own as with the other posted examples, but exactly copied the design, and for (obvious) good reason. It's the same reason why you refuse to incorporate more obvious identifiers into the "overstrikes"; a large "DC" mintmark would be a nice touch (imo), but you know as well as I that it would detract from the aesthetics of the original design. The act of producing very well may be an art, and for that I certainly do give you credit, but the design is just a copy, nothing less and nothing more.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am somewhat familiar with Mr. Boggs, and if memory serves me correctly, I believe his copies were done by hand. If wrong please do correct me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 2465487, member: 36230"]How am I insulting you? You implied what you do is perfectly acceptable for a "true artist", and I agreed; quit simple really. Even though I've no expectations that you'll admit reality (and I do understand why), the fact is the designs are copied. We can play our little semantics game if you'd like, but that's what they are. With the "overstrikes" in question, you did not simply incorporate certain past design elements into something of your own as with the other posted examples, but exactly copied the design, and for (obvious) good reason. It's the same reason why you refuse to incorporate more obvious identifiers into the "overstrikes"; a large "DC" mintmark would be a nice touch (imo), but you know as well as I that it would detract from the aesthetics of the original design. The act of producing very well may be an art, and for that I certainly do give you credit, but the design is just a copy, nothing less and nothing more. I am somewhat familiar with Mr. Boggs, and if memory serves me correctly, I believe his copies were done by hand. If wrong please do correct me.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Future of Daniel Carr Overstrikes?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...