Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Feuchtwanger Cent thread
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 575145, member: 4580"]Thanks for sharing, Hobo, Your photos are terrific. : )</p><p><br /></p><p>I think you may be right about mine, or possibly retrieved from saltwater, or both. LOL</p><p><br /></p><p>Yours is nice and in my estimation, its hole is not a serious detraction. In this case, it adds some interest. I suppose either you or I could have selected a better place for the hole. ; )</p><p><br /></p><p>On mine the detail of the eagle adds a lot of interest, and after looking at the photos of it for a couple of days,my opinion of the surfaces and estimated grade have changed to <b>EF details, 'minor granularity'.</b> In addition to detractions of the token, it has its strengths -- I'd call them 'details.' I believe the strictest graders today, armed with more knowledge than in the past would give the coin a 'VF, Granular' grade and comment.</p><p><br /></p><p>Among strengths is its possible luster remaining in the devices and typical of EF's, though long ago patinated, dulled, even possibly corroded. But the apparent roughness in the planchet surfaces of the fields are not seemingly reflected in damage to the eagle. It's also possible that what seems to be luster is residue from burial; that I will admit.</p><p><br /></p><p>20 years ago, if I'd walked through the door of a coin shop and showed them this piece, they would have all said "Porous Fine." and offered me a dollar, maybe. Today, I detect some <u>granularity</u> but not porosity.</p><p><br /></p><p>I suspect that mine was struck early on and that the planchet cracked in a few places at the time of striking, and that striking occurred while Feuchtwanger's 'composition' was still being developed. In fact, this may have been a trial piece, believe it or not. The planchet now reminds me of many ancient Greek and Roman coins after striking. : )</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm sure that further study of the 'composition' may help me better understand this one. I've much to learn about these before plodding into MS-63 territory, but heck for $50 and a $7.50 buyer's premium, and $5 for shipping and handling, then waiting 3 weeks plus for delivery, I'm happy to have my low-grade example safely here, and not where it came from. </p><p><br /></p><p>For me, one satisfaction is knowing that the item listing said <b>"WE WILL NOT SHIP,"</b> but I arranged bid, shipping and payment over the telephone.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sometimes an item stands out. To me, this was one of them. Mainly it's the eagle and a strange originality of the token, in spite of its obvious experience and detractions.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 575145, member: 4580"]Thanks for sharing, Hobo, Your photos are terrific. : ) I think you may be right about mine, or possibly retrieved from saltwater, or both. LOL Yours is nice and in my estimation, its hole is not a serious detraction. In this case, it adds some interest. I suppose either you or I could have selected a better place for the hole. ; ) On mine the detail of the eagle adds a lot of interest, and after looking at the photos of it for a couple of days,my opinion of the surfaces and estimated grade have changed to [B]EF details, 'minor granularity'.[/B] In addition to detractions of the token, it has its strengths -- I'd call them 'details.' I believe the strictest graders today, armed with more knowledge than in the past would give the coin a 'VF, Granular' grade and comment. Among strengths is its possible luster remaining in the devices and typical of EF's, though long ago patinated, dulled, even possibly corroded. But the apparent roughness in the planchet surfaces of the fields are not seemingly reflected in damage to the eagle. It's also possible that what seems to be luster is residue from burial; that I will admit. 20 years ago, if I'd walked through the door of a coin shop and showed them this piece, they would have all said "Porous Fine." and offered me a dollar, maybe. Today, I detect some [U]granularity[/U] but not porosity. I suspect that mine was struck early on and that the planchet cracked in a few places at the time of striking, and that striking occurred while Feuchtwanger's 'composition' was still being developed. In fact, this may have been a trial piece, believe it or not. The planchet now reminds me of many ancient Greek and Roman coins after striking. : ) I'm sure that further study of the 'composition' may help me better understand this one. I've much to learn about these before plodding into MS-63 territory, but heck for $50 and a $7.50 buyer's premium, and $5 for shipping and handling, then waiting 3 weeks plus for delivery, I'm happy to have my low-grade example safely here, and not where it came from. For me, one satisfaction is knowing that the item listing said [B]"WE WILL NOT SHIP,"[/B] but I arranged bid, shipping and payment over the telephone. Sometimes an item stands out. To me, this was one of them. Mainly it's the eagle and a strange originality of the token, in spite of its obvious experience and detractions.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Feuchtwanger Cent thread
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...