Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Countermark That Shouldn't Be: A Hadrian Alexandrian Drachm
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 4247992, member: 110226"]Yes, there's corrosion above the head, or at least a dip in the flan that caused some of the legend to go missing.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is the best (and only) image that I have right now. It is from eBay and not very good. I need to get a digital camera and learn to take my own pics.</p><p><br /></p><p>I did enlarge the image in Photoshop, but it is still pretty grainy.</p><p><br /></p><p>I've looked at quite a few tetradrachms of Caracalla. He certainly had numerous profile styles, probably the most of the later Roman emperors. I've noticed that the hair on the back of the portrait is normally tightly cropped. Here the hair flows backwards. Also, the hair in front flows upwards.</p><p><br /></p><p>I see what you mean by evidence of a laurel branch. There seems to be a slight point above the head that might indicate the existence of such a branch. Would it be possible that it could be part of the design, along the flowing hair? There's also a ribbon behind the head. Could the engraver be incorporating several elements?</p><p><br /></p><p>Caracalla had an obsession with the legend of Alexander III, going a far as equipping some of his soldiers in Macedonian garb!</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I guess I need to get the camera and try my hand. I guess I'm something of a Luddite. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1084156[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 4247992, member: 110226"]Yes, there's corrosion above the head, or at least a dip in the flan that caused some of the legend to go missing. This is the best (and only) image that I have right now. It is from eBay and not very good. I need to get a digital camera and learn to take my own pics. I did enlarge the image in Photoshop, but it is still pretty grainy. I've looked at quite a few tetradrachms of Caracalla. He certainly had numerous profile styles, probably the most of the later Roman emperors. I've noticed that the hair on the back of the portrait is normally tightly cropped. Here the hair flows backwards. Also, the hair in front flows upwards. I see what you mean by evidence of a laurel branch. There seems to be a slight point above the head that might indicate the existence of such a branch. Would it be possible that it could be part of the design, along the flowing hair? There's also a ribbon behind the head. Could the engraver be incorporating several elements? Caracalla had an obsession with the legend of Alexander III, going a far as equipping some of his soldiers in Macedonian garb! So, I guess I need to get the camera and try my hand. I guess I'm something of a Luddite. [ATTACH=full]1084156[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Countermark That Shouldn't Be: A Hadrian Alexandrian Drachm
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...