Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Controversy over 1841 Quarter Eagles, Part 2, Casual Collecting in the 1840s
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 1447322, member: 4381"]<a href="http://www.coinweek.com/news/featured-news/the-controversy-over-1841-quarter-eagles-part-2-casual-collecting-in-the-1840s/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinweek.com/news/featured-news/the-controversy-over-1841-quarter-eagles-part-2-casual-collecting-in-the-1840s/" rel="nofollow">http://www.coinweek.com/news/featured-news/the-controversy-over-1841-quarter-eagles-part-2-casual-collecting-in-the-1840s/</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>News and Analysis regarding scarce coins, coin markets, and the coin collecting community #108</p><p><br /></p><p>As this is the second in a three part series, in the next two paragraphs, I provide an introduction for those who have not read part 1 or do not clearly remember it. The point here in part 2 is to demonstrate that there are compelling logical reasons for Philadelphia Mint officials to have planned to strike twenty-five or more Proof 1841 Quarter Eagles, even though fewer than six Proofs were probably struck of each of all other Proof U.S. gold coin issues during the 1840s.</p><p><br /></p><p>Quarter Eagles (U.S. $2½ gold coins) were minted from 1796 to 1929, and in every year from 1829 to 1915. They are about the size of dimes and are 90% gold or nearly so. For decades, there was nearly unanimous agreement that all 1841 Quarter Eagles were struck in Proof format. There were no business strikes. There is now an ongoing debate, which is of tremendous importance, even to collectors who cannot afford 1841 Quarter Eagles. The debate relates to the definition of a Proof and whether experts can agree on the Proof status of a large number of 19th century coins, including many that are not particularly expensive.</p><p><br /></p><p>In Feb. 2012, the Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) announced that most known 1841 Quarter Eagles are really business strikes, not Proofs. The PCGS published a thirty seven-page report, The 1841 Quarter Eagle Revisited: A New Approach to a Classic Rarity. Moreover, PCGS mastermind David Hall determined that all but four 1841 Quarter Eagles are business strikes, “regular strikings.” David Akers agrees. Hall acknowledges, however, that experts are deeply divided over this issue.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 1447322, member: 4381"][url]http://www.coinweek.com/news/featured-news/the-controversy-over-1841-quarter-eagles-part-2-casual-collecting-in-the-1840s/[/url] News and Analysis regarding scarce coins, coin markets, and the coin collecting community #108 As this is the second in a three part series, in the next two paragraphs, I provide an introduction for those who have not read part 1 or do not clearly remember it. The point here in part 2 is to demonstrate that there are compelling logical reasons for Philadelphia Mint officials to have planned to strike twenty-five or more Proof 1841 Quarter Eagles, even though fewer than six Proofs were probably struck of each of all other Proof U.S. gold coin issues during the 1840s. Quarter Eagles (U.S. $2½ gold coins) were minted from 1796 to 1929, and in every year from 1829 to 1915. They are about the size of dimes and are 90% gold or nearly so. For decades, there was nearly unanimous agreement that all 1841 Quarter Eagles were struck in Proof format. There were no business strikes. There is now an ongoing debate, which is of tremendous importance, even to collectors who cannot afford 1841 Quarter Eagles. The debate relates to the definition of a Proof and whether experts can agree on the Proof status of a large number of 19th century coins, including many that are not particularly expensive. In Feb. 2012, the Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) announced that most known 1841 Quarter Eagles are really business strikes, not Proofs. The PCGS published a thirty seven-page report, The 1841 Quarter Eagle Revisited: A New Approach to a Classic Rarity. Moreover, PCGS mastermind David Hall determined that all but four 1841 Quarter Eagles are business strikes, “regular strikings.” David Akers agrees. Hall acknowledges, however, that experts are deeply divided over this issue.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The Controversy over 1841 Quarter Eagles, Part 2, Casual Collecting in the 1840s
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...