Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The contrarian approach: gold Kennedy pocket piece?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1964176, member: 112"]Well yes, but only to a limited degree, and only in modern times. You see, the original reason for minting coins of a gold alloy (or silver alloy for that matter) as opposed to pure gold was not to make the coins wear better, but to make more money for the entity minting the coins. It has only been within modern times that wear was ever an issue.</p><p><br /></p><p>Coins, from the moment they came into existence, had a face value based on an equal weight of pure metal. And for almost 2 millennia coins were made, for the most part, of pure metal. Some think that a 1,000 years ago man did not have the technology to refine gold and silver to their pure states. But that simply isn't true. Even a thousand years ago they had the ability to pick whatever level of purity they wanted, down to within 3 decimal points, and hit it right on the numbers at will. It was only when the Royals and nobility came up with the idea that they could make more money for themselves by debasing the purity of the metal that alloys came into use.</p><p><br /></p><p>When it started the alloy percentages were very low, Venetian ducats kind of led the way with a 1.4% debasement in the 13th century. For a couple hundred years other coins were still minted of pure gold. But then economics reared its head and debasement began in earnest.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1964176, member: 112"]Well yes, but only to a limited degree, and only in modern times. You see, the original reason for minting coins of a gold alloy (or silver alloy for that matter) as opposed to pure gold was not to make the coins wear better, but to make more money for the entity minting the coins. It has only been within modern times that wear was ever an issue. Coins, from the moment they came into existence, had a face value based on an equal weight of pure metal. And for almost 2 millennia coins were made, for the most part, of pure metal. Some think that a 1,000 years ago man did not have the technology to refine gold and silver to their pure states. But that simply isn't true. Even a thousand years ago they had the ability to pick whatever level of purity they wanted, down to within 3 decimal points, and hit it right on the numbers at will. It was only when the Royals and nobility came up with the idea that they could make more money for themselves by debasing the purity of the metal that alloys came into use. When it started the alloy percentages were very low, Venetian ducats kind of led the way with a 1.4% debasement in the 13th century. For a couple hundred years other coins were still minted of pure gold. But then economics reared its head and debasement began in earnest.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The contrarian approach: gold Kennedy pocket piece?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...