Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BenSi, post: 7953309, member: 95174&quot;]As you were typing I was reading some of the final chapters od DM Metcalf&nbsp; &quot;The Origins of the Anastasian Currency reform. The book was published in 1969. </p><p><br /></p><p>He states it is debatable but the consensus was small module first then the larger one, this was continued by Justin I. </p><p>He also mentions the smaller ones continued to circulate with the large ones but only given half the value of their markings. The only proof towards this is a scarcity of the large half follis. </p><p><br /></p><p>I always take D.M. Metcalf with a grain of salt because he might have changed his mind as his years progressed as he did on many subjects.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in