Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The City of LOMDOM - A Long Sought Error
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TheRed, post: 7444164, member: 87080"]Thanks for clearing up the confusion [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] That is a great coin of Maximian (?), I find it funny that the mistake was being made roughly 1000 years before Edward's die engravers were making it. Having to engrave in the reverse is provably much more difficult than I imagine.</p><p><br /></p><p>To your points [USER=10461]@lordmarcovan[/USER] and [USER=110504]@+VGO.DVCKS[/USER] the technology of die engraving was going through a real change under Edward III. The new coinage of Edward I still utilised composite letters in the legends, including retrograde N. Here is a penny of his that I bought because of the quality of the legends.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1291325[/ATTACH] </p><p>It's really easy to see the punches that were used to make letters like the X, O, D, and W. </p><p><br /></p><p>By the time Edward III introduced the groat in his 4th coinage that was still the case. Class B groats are identifiable because of the composite M and E in the legends. Here is my example where it is clear on the reverse.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1291326[/ATTACH] </p><p>That began to change with later issues of coins. The M changes from composite to the Lombardic M made with a single punch. The composite letters E, C, R, and S in the series B groat also change to an integral letter from a single punch over the course of Edwards reign. By the time post-tray groats are being issued in 1369 the only letters that are a composite is the N in the inner reverse legend and the X in the obverse legend. The example of a post-treaty groat below has great legends. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1291328[/ATTACH] </p><p>Sadly not my coin, I don't have $3k for a groat. The coins of Richard II are very similar to those of his grandfather, and still retain composite letters such as the N in LON/DON on the reverse of his groats. My example is Type III from London.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1291332[/ATTACH] </p><p>It is my understanding that composite letters don't disappear from English silver hammered coins until the reign of Henry IV and his light coinage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TheRed, post: 7444164, member: 87080"]Thanks for clearing up the confusion [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] That is a great coin of Maximian (?), I find it funny that the mistake was being made roughly 1000 years before Edward's die engravers were making it. Having to engrave in the reverse is provably much more difficult than I imagine. To your points [USER=10461]@lordmarcovan[/USER] and [USER=110504]@+VGO.DVCKS[/USER] the technology of die engraving was going through a real change under Edward III. The new coinage of Edward I still utilised composite letters in the legends, including retrograde N. Here is a penny of his that I bought because of the quality of the legends. [ATTACH=full]1291325[/ATTACH] It's really easy to see the punches that were used to make letters like the X, O, D, and W. By the time Edward III introduced the groat in his 4th coinage that was still the case. Class B groats are identifiable because of the composite M and E in the legends. Here is my example where it is clear on the reverse. [ATTACH=full]1291326[/ATTACH] That began to change with later issues of coins. The M changes from composite to the Lombardic M made with a single punch. The composite letters E, C, R, and S in the series B groat also change to an integral letter from a single punch over the course of Edwards reign. By the time post-tray groats are being issued in 1369 the only letters that are a composite is the N in the inner reverse legend and the X in the obverse legend. The example of a post-treaty groat below has great legends. [ATTACH=full]1291328[/ATTACH] Sadly not my coin, I don't have $3k for a groat. The coins of Richard II are very similar to those of his grandfather, and still retain composite letters such as the N in LON/DON on the reverse of his groats. My example is Type III from London. [ATTACH=full]1291332[/ATTACH] It is my understanding that composite letters don't disappear from English silver hammered coins until the reign of Henry IV and his light coinage.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The City of LOMDOM - A Long Sought Error
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...