Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The CAC Poll
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Vess1, post: 469371, member: 13650"]From what I've read (which was posted and deleted) the company is trying to weed out the lower end coins in general. They hope by cataloging all they look at by their serial numbers and by affixing their stickers, that the more premium ones will rise to the top, while a slab without the sticker will hopefully be scrutinized more, as to why it doesn't have one. As time goes on, they expect that most premium coins will go through their service. </p><p><br /></p><p> What I have trouble agreeing with is that "B" coins will get a green sticker as well as an "A" coin. Reason being that they think median examples that are not of low quality and/or doctored have become increasingly elusive.</p><p><br /></p><p> So you don't really know sight unseen if it's a B or an A, but it absolutely should not be a C. And trust me, I've seen some bad mint state C's. Eye appeal is probably going to play a large role. </p><p><br /></p><p> An under-graded, premium high quality A will be all that gets the gold sticker. Perhaps they should only be giving the green sticker to A quality coins? But maybe that would raise the price too much and they'd rather have the B and A price range even out, rather than affecting price more severely? Plus it creates a buffer.</p><p><br /></p><p> At least we should know what the green sticker means now and that it actually SHOULD justify paying more for the coin as that is the whole point of the program. So that the nicer, properly graded ones are labeled and others simply won't be. Like it or not, it's fractional grading which we knew was coming, looks to be here to stay and should theoretically properly adjust prices.</p><p><br /></p><p> For everyone that's angry about it, the beauty of it is that you can still look at a stickered slab for yourself and if you don't agree with either grading service's opinion on an individual piece.........you can still PASS on it just as you would a raw coin. Which is why I don't see the big deal.</p><p><br /></p><p> An ungraded coin obviously, and automatically has two grade opinions. The seller's and the buyer's and then it's always possible that its a good counterfeit or has been cleaned and doctored. I know that's how it's always been in the past but maybe some people don't want to deal with that? </p><p> The dealer's always going to think their opinion is correct no matter how good of a grader you are. At least a dealer can't try to pass off a slabbed AU50 coin to you as a MS-60 and expect you to meet in the middle.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Vess1, post: 469371, member: 13650"]From what I've read (which was posted and deleted) the company is trying to weed out the lower end coins in general. They hope by cataloging all they look at by their serial numbers and by affixing their stickers, that the more premium ones will rise to the top, while a slab without the sticker will hopefully be scrutinized more, as to why it doesn't have one. As time goes on, they expect that most premium coins will go through their service. What I have trouble agreeing with is that "B" coins will get a green sticker as well as an "A" coin. Reason being that they think median examples that are not of low quality and/or doctored have become increasingly elusive. So you don't really know sight unseen if it's a B or an A, but it absolutely should not be a C. And trust me, I've seen some bad mint state C's. Eye appeal is probably going to play a large role. An under-graded, premium high quality A will be all that gets the gold sticker. Perhaps they should only be giving the green sticker to A quality coins? But maybe that would raise the price too much and they'd rather have the B and A price range even out, rather than affecting price more severely? Plus it creates a buffer. At least we should know what the green sticker means now and that it actually SHOULD justify paying more for the coin as that is the whole point of the program. So that the nicer, properly graded ones are labeled and others simply won't be. Like it or not, it's fractional grading which we knew was coming, looks to be here to stay and should theoretically properly adjust prices. For everyone that's angry about it, the beauty of it is that you can still look at a stickered slab for yourself and if you don't agree with either grading service's opinion on an individual piece.........you can still PASS on it just as you would a raw coin. Which is why I don't see the big deal. An ungraded coin obviously, and automatically has two grade opinions. The seller's and the buyer's and then it's always possible that its a good counterfeit or has been cleaned and doctored. I know that's how it's always been in the past but maybe some people don't want to deal with that? The dealer's always going to think their opinion is correct no matter how good of a grader you are. At least a dealer can't try to pass off a slabbed AU50 coin to you as a MS-60 and expect you to meet in the middle.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
The CAC Poll
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...