Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Big Four
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 19587, member: 57463"]Allow me to post a few tangential observations:</p><p><br /></p><p>There is way too much talk about "bottom feeders" and "fourth tier" companies. I have written in defense of Alan Hager who has been the target of a lot of abuse from these tyros and their paradigmatic "consumer advocates" who run for ANA Board slots. Alan Hager's marketing strategies and tactics might not instill you with a sense of confidence that you will get one over on him, but rather that he will have gotten one over on you. Even so, the fact is that people in the hobby with a lifetime of professional achievement admit that Alan Hager knows his coins. If you are known to him as a professional of merit and you ask him how the other companies will grade a coin, he will hit the nail on the head for you. </p><p><br /></p><p>There are many reasons why PCGS achieved the perception of being the preferred service. One of the reaons is that when Rick Montgomery was at PCGS, he adhered to a policy of correcting their mistakes. This actually meant that on the ANA bourse floor, a dealer known for his judgment could approach Montgomery with a coin and whine, "Aww, Rick, look at this. How can I get 4 money for it? It's a mess and you know it." And Montgomery would have the coin reslabbed MS-63 or whatever. That carried a lot of weight with dealers, especially as they do business on the telephone with each other. They could count on PCGS's idea of a grade meeting everyone else's expectations. (Rick Montgomery is now at NGC, though he perhaps maintains some position as a stockholder with Collector's Universe, parent of PCGS.)</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, the fact remains that these grading companies see thousands of coins at a time. Their graders are employees who come and go. If you look at enough slabs, you will see perhaps obvious differences between the same grade for the same coin. It is unavoidable. That is one of the reasons that we say, "Buy the coin, not the holder."</p><p><br /></p><p>One series that I happen to know from some experience and reading is the Mercury Dime. I shook my head at four PCGS slabbed MS-66 and MS-67 from 1942, 43, and 44. If this one is, then that one cannot be...</p><p><br /></p><p>Similarly, if you go to any ANA convention, you can find nice coins graded dead right center on by any or all of the services, top tier or twelfth. Whether you can sell the coin at the grade over the telephone to a dealer is a totally different question.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 19587, member: 57463"]Allow me to post a few tangential observations: There is way too much talk about "bottom feeders" and "fourth tier" companies. I have written in defense of Alan Hager who has been the target of a lot of abuse from these tyros and their paradigmatic "consumer advocates" who run for ANA Board slots. Alan Hager's marketing strategies and tactics might not instill you with a sense of confidence that you will get one over on him, but rather that he will have gotten one over on you. Even so, the fact is that people in the hobby with a lifetime of professional achievement admit that Alan Hager knows his coins. If you are known to him as a professional of merit and you ask him how the other companies will grade a coin, he will hit the nail on the head for you. There are many reasons why PCGS achieved the perception of being the preferred service. One of the reaons is that when Rick Montgomery was at PCGS, he adhered to a policy of correcting their mistakes. This actually meant that on the ANA bourse floor, a dealer known for his judgment could approach Montgomery with a coin and whine, "Aww, Rick, look at this. How can I get 4 money for it? It's a mess and you know it." And Montgomery would have the coin reslabbed MS-63 or whatever. That carried a lot of weight with dealers, especially as they do business on the telephone with each other. They could count on PCGS's idea of a grade meeting everyone else's expectations. (Rick Montgomery is now at NGC, though he perhaps maintains some position as a stockholder with Collector's Universe, parent of PCGS.) That said, the fact remains that these grading companies see thousands of coins at a time. Their graders are employees who come and go. If you look at enough slabs, you will see perhaps obvious differences between the same grade for the same coin. It is unavoidable. That is one of the reasons that we say, "Buy the coin, not the holder." One series that I happen to know from some experience and reading is the Mercury Dime. I shook my head at four PCGS slabbed MS-66 and MS-67 from 1942, 43, and 44. If this one is, then that one cannot be... Similarly, if you go to any ANA convention, you can find nice coins graded dead right center on by any or all of the services, top tier or twelfth. Whether you can sell the coin at the grade over the telephone to a dealer is a totally different question.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The Big Four
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...