Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Volodya, post: 4120724, member: 19615&quot;]Yeah. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>There&#039;s an ironic little story about this type. The NAC RBW catalogue rather smugly points out that Rick&#039;s coin is ex Gemini V, where it was &quot;miscatalogued.&quot; <i>Mea culpa</i>; clearly I wasn&#039;t paying attention in 2009 when I lazily called it 44/7. NAC 61 went on to boast that their coin was &quot;Of the highest rarity, only the second specimen known.&quot; But ahem; <i>my </i>example came out of NAC 21 in 2001, ten years earlier than RBW I, where it was--wait for it--miscatalogued as 44/7. That one I <b>did </b>spot and grab for under the estimate.</p><p><br /></p><p>There&#039;s a moral in there somewhere, but I&#039;ve no real idea what it is.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in