Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Antioch mint under Justinian
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 3119427, member: 44316"]Long ago I created a web site on the mintmarks of Justinian at Antioch, which was renamed Theopolis (city of God) after two major earthquakes destroyed much of the city. The coins and the story are here:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/interesting/Justinian.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/interesting/Justinian.html" rel="nofollow">http://augustuscoins.com/ed/interesting/Justinian.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>If you already read the previous version there is not much new. But today I increased the font size, illustrated the various mintmarks up top (with links to the coins), and generally improved the navigation. Here is my favorite coin on the page with its mintmark first:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]793390[/ATTACH]</p><p>"θVΠO" is close to spelling out Theoupolis.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]793391[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]793392[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Sear 218B.</p><p>40-nummia.</p><p>39 mm, 20.77 grams.</p><p>Mintmark: θVΠO</p><p>on a large follis of year 13.</p><p><br /></p><p>The reform which yielded this new, larger, coin started in year 12 at Constantinople but did not begin at Antioch until year 13 and none were issued in year 14 or 15 (probably due to the invasion of Khusru mentioned on the site). The mintmark switched to Latin in year 16 (see the year-16 coin on the site), so, this short-version mintmark was used only in year 13 making this a one-year type.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 3119427, member: 44316"]Long ago I created a web site on the mintmarks of Justinian at Antioch, which was renamed Theopolis (city of God) after two major earthquakes destroyed much of the city. The coins and the story are here: [url]http://augustuscoins.com/ed/interesting/Justinian.html[/url] If you already read the previous version there is not much new. But today I increased the font size, illustrated the various mintmarks up top (with links to the coins), and generally improved the navigation. Here is my favorite coin on the page with its mintmark first: [ATTACH=full]793390[/ATTACH] "θVΠO" is close to spelling out Theoupolis. [ATTACH=full]793391[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]793392[/ATTACH] Sear 218B. 40-nummia. 39 mm, 20.77 grams. Mintmark: θVΠO on a large follis of year 13. The reform which yielded this new, larger, coin started in year 12 at Constantinople but did not begin at Antioch until year 13 and none were issued in year 14 or 15 (probably due to the invasion of Khusru mentioned on the site). The mintmark switched to Latin in year 16 (see the year-16 coin on the site), so, this short-version mintmark was used only in year 13 making this a one-year type.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
The Antioch mint under Justinian
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...