Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 207762, member: 4626&quot;]Well OK, we&#039;ll see one way or the other soon I guess.&nbsp; Still, no offense to ND86 or anything, but without knowing where the information is coming from I have no idea whether ND86 is, or has access to, an actual authoritative source of information, or is just an extremely lucky guesser.&nbsp; I&#039;d much prefer an actual press release from the Mint or the words of an actual Mint employee (who is in high enough of a position to know such things) than just an &quot;ND86 said so&quot; argument, when I have no idea what his credentials or sources of information are.&nbsp; Someone can be right 999,999 times in a row and still be wrong the millionth time, a track record isn&#039;t by itself proof of anything but probability.&nbsp; He may very well be right, and I&#039;m even willing to concede that he <i>probably</i> is, given his track record, but until I see proof that his is <i>definitely</i> right, I won&#039;t concede that I&#039;m <i>definitely</i> wrong.&nbsp; Especially when I have the word from people whose enitre job is to know what coins are for sale and when that the sets won&#039;t contain the presidential dollars (they may very well be mistaken of course, but I&#039;d rather rely on the word of someone whose credentials I know that of somebody whose real name I don&#039;t even know.&nbsp; Again, no offense to ND86.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway likely to be a moot point in about two months time or so anyway, lol...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in