Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The 1882 O/S Morgan Top 100 Vam or Refuted Over Mint Mark
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8429545, member: 24314"]<font size="6"><span style="color: #ff0000">No. </span></font> My company has boycotted the ANA convention for several years after the very shoddy way Randy Campbell was treated at a Chicago Convention. Including our company being left out of the show program and being placed away from the other grading services! If Randy had not been on the FUN Board and one of the ANA governors had not helped out to get chairs for the table, who knows how much worse things would have been!</p><p><br /></p><p>Messydesk has offered to show me a die progression twice so eventually it will happen. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Note, your <span style="color: #ff00ff">statement</span> is incorrect. There is no way to tell the die life of die pairs as they often do not last together for the same amount of strikes. For example, an obverse die could break after 100 strikes while the reverse could strike thousands of coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Dollar experts claim to have a die progression. I have not been able to confirm one. </p><p><br /></p><p>ANYWAY, <b><font size="6"><span style="color: #ff0000">you'll note that my question above has not been addressed here at all - yet. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></font></b> I am now leaning to a completely different and unlisted O/S reverse rather than EDS/LDS progression. <b>Proof of this may be in the different placement of the mint marks shown above for the <span style="color: #ff0000">same</span> VAM</b>. </p><p><br /></p><p>And for the benefit of the several <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie34" alt=":clown:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I ignore. I have complete respect for the folks <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> in this discussion who subscribe to the "long-established" die state progression I have questioned FOR DECADES!</p><p><br /></p><p>I'll also remind the dollar "experts" that THEY are the same folks who believed the Micro-O counterfeits were genuine at the same time THEY formulated this EDS/LDS O/S <b><span style="color: #b35900">crap! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8429545, member: 24314"][SIZE=6][COLOR=#ff0000]No. [/COLOR][/SIZE] My company has boycotted the ANA convention for several years after the very shoddy way Randy Campbell was treated at a Chicago Convention. Including our company being left out of the show program and being placed away from the other grading services! If Randy had not been on the FUN Board and one of the ANA governors had not helped out to get chairs for the table, who knows how much worse things would have been! Messydesk has offered to show me a die progression twice so eventually it will happen. Note, your [COLOR=#ff00ff]statement[/COLOR] is incorrect. There is no way to tell the die life of die pairs as they often do not last together for the same amount of strikes. For example, an obverse die could break after 100 strikes while the reverse could strike thousands of coins. The Dollar experts claim to have a die progression. I have not been able to confirm one. ANYWAY, [B][SIZE=6][COLOR=#ff0000]you'll note that my question above has not been addressed here at all - yet. :([/COLOR][/SIZE][/B] I am now leaning to a completely different and unlisted O/S reverse rather than EDS/LDS progression. [B]Proof of this may be in the different placement of the mint marks shown above for the [COLOR=#ff0000]same[/COLOR] VAM[/B]. And for the benefit of the several :clown: I ignore. I have complete respect for the folks :bookworm::cigar: in this discussion who subscribe to the "long-established" die state progression I have questioned FOR DECADES! I'll also remind the dollar "experts" that THEY are the same folks who believed the Micro-O counterfeits were genuine at the same time THEY formulated this EDS/LDS O/S [B][COLOR=#b35900]crap! :D[/COLOR][/B][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
The 1882 O/S Morgan Top 100 Vam or Refuted Over Mint Mark
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...