Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 8425194, member: 24314&quot;]I&#039;m bumping this thread and waiting for a reply.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/1882_os_vam4eds_lds_ba-jpg.1483259/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>AGAIN:</p><p><br /></p><p>The &quot;so-called&quot; EDS on left shows the distance on the left side of the &quot;O&quot; farther away then the design.&nbsp; Note the weakness at the upper left of the image.&nbsp; One would expect die wear to weaken and spread out the design elements on a finished coin; HOWEVER, as you can see above the &quot;so-called&quot; EDS&nbsp; is the image where this has possibly happened.&nbsp; The LDS on the right is both stronger and in a different position.&nbsp;&nbsp; <b><i><font size="6"><span style="color: #b30000">I should think this image is ENOUGH to prove there has been a long-held error concerning EDS and LDS on this variety. </span></font></i></b></p><p><b><i><font size="6"><span style="color: #b30000"><br /></span></font></i></b></p><p><font size="5"><span style="color: #000000">comments? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></font></p><p><font size="5"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></font></p><p><font size="5"><span style="color: #000000">PS I am banned from Collector&#039;s Universe forums.&nbsp; Perhaps someone could post this question over there and invite comments here on CT.</span></font></p><p><font size="5"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></font></p><p>[USER=13813]@CaptHenway[/USER][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in