Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2500655, member: 24314&quot;]John, </p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for taking the time to post.&nbsp; However, IMO your photos show nothing of value to make your point.&nbsp; I&#039;ll bet we can find similar things on plain 1882-O dollars and I shall look this week.&nbsp; I want to see proof of a <span style="color: #b30000">die progression </span>in the form of IDENTICAL die polish or IDENTICAL die crack progression that links the die states!&nbsp; For all I know, every different EDS or LDS coin can be a completely different die resulting in a doubling of the known O/S VAM&#039;s.</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #00b359">Now, If I can get you to agree that the strong O/S photo is the EARLY DIE STATE and the broken &quot;S&quot; inside the O/S is the Late Die State - EXACTLY OPPOSITE to the now held belief -&nbsp; the entire issue will be solved to my satisfaction.&nbsp; Whatever comes of this, one of us is correct. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span></p><p><br /></p><p>As for this point you make:&nbsp; &quot;On the EDS coin, this comes to a more distinct point, while on the other, the point has been blurred a bit by die wear.&quot;&nbsp; If the sharp pointer coin was the second off the die and the blunt point coin was the 2000th coin that would mute your point.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in