Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2517559, member: 71723&quot;]Have you been following the news on IP law? There have been some real &quot;head scratcher&quot; decisions coming down out there. Besides, &quot;trade dress&quot; is a much lower standard than other IP. Eastman Kodak once was held to &quot;own&quot; a color - &quot;Kodak box yellow&quot;. [See, <i>inter alia, EASTMAN KODAK CO., Plaintiff, v. FOTOMAT CORPORATION, Defendant, <i>317 F.Supp. 304 (1970).]</i></i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p>Under that standard, maybe [USER=4781]@dcarr[/USER] needs to look out for the Miami Dolphins, eh? I follow a weekly podcast called &quot;This Week in Law&quot; which deals almost exclusively in IP cases. Train commutes allow for lots of stuff.</p><p><br /></p><p>As of this writing, only the 9th Circuit seems to be walking back the standard on &quot;DMCA takedown notices&quot;, the most pro-complainant statute out there. While you can indict a ham sandwich, it seems that you can get into court on an IP issue just by suing the mustard on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>In other words, do you think that there are such obvious differences in the look of all four of the top TPGS&#039; slabs is merely a coincidence? Maybe, but I have doubts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in