Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1446488, member: 15309&quot;]It isn&#039;t written anywhere.&nbsp; But if you are going to make ridiculous claims and not back them up, don&#039;t get mad at me when I accuse you of blowing smoke.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Doug, our entire conversation regarding gradeflation was in reference to classic coinage.&nbsp; You know it, I know it, heck even the newbies who can&#039;t spell gradeflation know it.&nbsp; So for you to hang your hat on some increases in modern ultra high grade coins is disingenuous at best.&nbsp; As for you submission numbers.&nbsp; Totals don&#039;t mean anything.&nbsp; You need to examine the number of high grade moderns being submitted year by year.&nbsp; Do you have that information?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>The reason I didn&#039;t provide any proof was because you decided to throw out stats on every single series of modern coins.&nbsp; Furthermore, you have data that I don&#039;t have.&nbsp; If you provide me with the population reports of all of the moderns in every grade for both 2003 &amp; 2004, then I could do it.&nbsp; And if I can&#039;t, I will admit that I am wrong.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You are a mod, why can&#039;t you just look up my e-mail?&nbsp; And yes, you did cherrypick the data.&nbsp; And no, the data doesn&#039;t speak for itself.&nbsp; The only way you can avoid the perception that you are skewing the data is to show transparency by disclosing all of the data that you have to me so that I can analyze it for myself.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, In what year would you say that the US mint perfected it&#039;s quality with regard to it&#039;s production to proof coinage?&nbsp; Mid 90&#039;s?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in