Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1446127, member: 15309&quot;]Actually, NO, I didn&#039;t.&nbsp; At least not with the intent you are claiming.&nbsp; I was working on my response to your comment in another thread, <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t206022-9/#ixzz1vWBX8Mop" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t206022-9/#ixzz1vWBX8Mop">http://www.cointalk.com/t206022-9/#ixzz1vWBX8Mop</a> , when I stumbled upon your previous comments about gradeflation.&nbsp; Notice that both of the threads that I quoted here are GTG threads started by me!&nbsp; It was dumb luck that I found it Doug.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>No I won&#039;t.&nbsp; You are the one claiming that grading standards have changed.&nbsp; It is incumbent upon you to prove that.&nbsp; As your proof, you offered population reports of ultra high grade moderns from 2003 &amp; 2004.&nbsp; I debunked your theory rather easily.&nbsp; Ball is in your court.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I will take your word for it!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I only need the total number of MS graded coins for each coin listed in 2003 but if you want to give me all of the data for all of the MS grades I will take it.&nbsp; Unlike you, I don&#039;t make a hypothesis, and then try to make the numbers support my claim.&nbsp; I want to look at all of the relevant data so that I can make an informed conclusion.&nbsp; Your claim is that a population increase of a single grade of a single date/mm is evidence by itself that the TPG&#039;s DELIBERATELY changed their grading standards.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think it is possible to reach that conclusion with such little data and want to see more.&nbsp; That should be a sufficient answer to your question of why.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in