Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical v. Market Grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1445186, member: 15309"]To my knowledge, the TV hucksters sold mostly ICG and ANACS. What I am saying is that the popularity of the state quarter program in combination with the explosion of registries is a more likely cause of the change in those population reports than a change in grading standard. If a change in grading standard was the cause and the number of submissions is not the cause, then you would have to examine the populations of the MS68 & PF68 coins as well. </p><p><br /></p><p>All those numbers show is that a whole bunch of proof sets were submitted for grading in 2003. That in itself does not prove that a change in grading standards is what caused the drastic increase in submissions. In today's market, you get many large submissions of moderns with the expectation that the MS70's and PF70's pay for the venture. This data seems to suggest that 2003 was the start of that strategy. </p><p><br /></p><p>But again, I don't really care about the modern market or the grading standards for modern coins. As far as I am concerned, they are all widgets.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1445186, member: 15309"]To my knowledge, the TV hucksters sold mostly ICG and ANACS. What I am saying is that the popularity of the state quarter program in combination with the explosion of registries is a more likely cause of the change in those population reports than a change in grading standard. If a change in grading standard was the cause and the number of submissions is not the cause, then you would have to examine the populations of the MS68 & PF68 coins as well. All those numbers show is that a whole bunch of proof sets were submitted for grading in 2003. That in itself does not prove that a change in grading standards is what caused the drastic increase in submissions. In today's market, you get many large submissions of moderns with the expectation that the MS70's and PF70's pay for the venture. This data seems to suggest that 2003 was the start of that strategy. But again, I don't really care about the modern market or the grading standards for modern coins. As far as I am concerned, they are all widgets.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical v. Market Grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...