Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1444365, member: 15309&quot;]Well, if he is going to admit that they deliberately undergraded coins in the early days of the TPG in order to value grade them, then NO, my statements are not contradictory.&nbsp; Their grading standard dictated the coin was an MS67 but they slapped an MS65 on the label in order to satisfy the current price guide.&nbsp; Once they evolved, they stopped value grading coins which necessitated the undergrading.&nbsp; But the whole time, the coin was an MS67 and there was no change in grading standard.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Did you completely miss my entire post?&nbsp; I am going to provide two different quotes from Salzburg.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>When he says &quot;NGC doesn&#039;t price coins&quot; he is speaking in present tense.&nbsp; When he says &quot;We were grading based on value as well&quot; he is speaking in past tense.&nbsp; It means that NGC used to value grade coins but they don&#039;t anymore.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in