Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical v. Market Grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Leadfoot, post: 1444318, member: 2972"]Those are "facts" that you have chosen to support your position, and they are not in conflict with my own definition of the terms. We are both picking and choosing those parts that support our position -- we are each defining the terms how we see as best -- and you are no different than I in that regard. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That's why I used the word "essentially". Please take a look at the (modified) definition I proposed above and repeated here:</p><p><br /></p><p><i>"Market grading = using a more subjective standard to come to the relative rank of a coin based on a predicted market perception of a coin. By ranking coins, they (i.e. TPGs) are essentially pricing them."</i></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In your world, where you get to define terms or choose who you look to as an authority, that may be true. In my world, things are different. Who's right? Both of us!</p><p><br /></p><p>The point I was trying to make is that technical grading was the way the market graded coins before market grading was a term.</p><p><br /></p><p>As an aside, EAC grading, a type of market grading I would argue, was used far before 1986.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Did I ever suggest grading standards haven't changed? I don't think so.</p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In a way you have. On multiple occasions you've presented things as "the truth" and argued anyone who disagrees is incorrect. You've chosen parts of the article as evidence that support you're opinion as "the truth", when it is really only your opinion. I have done the same (although I try hard to not portray my opinion as truth). In the end, each of our perceptions (e.g. opinions) are reality, and, with all due respect, you do not get to decide whose opinions are "the truth" and whose are not. Perception is reality, and each of our perception is different. It's part of the human condition, and, IMO, you would be wise to consider that before suggesting your view is "the truth" and everyone who disagrees is wrong.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Again, have I suggested that standards don't change? I cannot recall those arguments coming out of my mouth or fingers -- and I certainly haven't espoused that position in this this thread -- but then again, I've posted a lot over the years and my memory is hardly perfect.</p><p><br /></p><p>Respectfully...Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Leadfoot, post: 1444318, member: 2972"]Those are "facts" that you have chosen to support your position, and they are not in conflict with my own definition of the terms. We are both picking and choosing those parts that support our position -- we are each defining the terms how we see as best -- and you are no different than I in that regard. That's why I used the word "essentially". Please take a look at the (modified) definition I proposed above and repeated here: [i]"Market grading = using a more subjective standard to come to the relative rank of a coin based on a predicted market perception of a coin. By ranking coins, they (i.e. TPGs) are essentially pricing them."[/i] In your world, where you get to define terms or choose who you look to as an authority, that may be true. In my world, things are different. Who's right? Both of us! The point I was trying to make is that technical grading was the way the market graded coins before market grading was a term. As an aside, EAC grading, a type of market grading I would argue, was used far before 1986. Did I ever suggest grading standards haven't changed? I don't think so. In a way you have. On multiple occasions you've presented things as "the truth" and argued anyone who disagrees is incorrect. You've chosen parts of the article as evidence that support you're opinion as "the truth", when it is really only your opinion. I have done the same (although I try hard to not portray my opinion as truth). In the end, each of our perceptions (e.g. opinions) are reality, and, with all due respect, you do not get to decide whose opinions are "the truth" and whose are not. Perception is reality, and each of our perception is different. It's part of the human condition, and, IMO, you would be wise to consider that before suggesting your view is "the truth" and everyone who disagrees is wrong. Again, have I suggested that standards don't change? I cannot recall those arguments coming out of my mouth or fingers -- and I certainly haven't espoused that position in this this thread -- but then again, I've posted a lot over the years and my memory is hardly perfect. Respectfully...Mike[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical v. Market Grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...