Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;900fine, post: 354217, member: 6036&quot;]One of the big problems I see is that this forces some change in each of the TPGs.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>That means that some old slabs are now misgraded, and not for the normal reasons.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>What to do in cases where a TPG&#039;s standard changed ? For example, let&#039;s say you&#039;re holding an old slab NGC MS63, which, by the new standards, is an MS64.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It seems there would have to be a way to get the coin regraded to new standards on the cheap <i>a la </i>reholdering, so that everything evens out.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If the new standards were stricter*, no one would want to downgrade the slab. This would lead to ENORMOUS confusion about value of &quot;old slab / new slab&quot;. Chaos.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The more I think about it, I&#039;m concerned the remedy is worse than the disease...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>All of which begs the question - <b>how different are the standards for NGC vs PCGS ?</b> I&#039;m sure it varies issue by issue.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="1">* for a given TPG / issue / grade</font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in