Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical grading vs Market grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="vavet, post: 353896, member: 11630"]It had "absolutely nothing to do with the grading of coins that PCGS was doing. It had only to do with advertising." </p><p> </p><p>Part of that bogus advertising (that is still being done in a vailed manner today) was that their grading was "consistent", "objective", "unbiased", and that they weren't grading their own coins.</p><p> </p><p>For the benefit of anyone interested, here's the rest of the story straight from the source.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 17, 1990</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> FTC CHARGES COIN CERTIFICATION CO. MISREPRESENTS</p><p> OBJECTIVITY OF ITS COIN GRADING SERVICES;</p><p> COMPANY AGREES TO SETTLEMENT</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> The Federal Trade Commission has charged that Professional</p><p>Coin Grading Service, Inc. ("PCGS") misled consumers by falsely</p><p>claiming that it provides consistent, objective grading of coins</p><p>and that investment in PCGS-certified rare coins eliminates all</p><p>the risk associated with the grading of coins. Under a consent</p><p>decree filed August 16 in federal district court, PCGS is prohibit-</p><p>ed from making false representations about its objectivity, con-</p><p>sistency, or the liquidity of its coins, and from making deceptive</p><p>statements about the risks of investing in graded coins. </p><p><br /></p><p> According to the FTC's Boston Regional Office, which handled</p><p>the investigation, PCGS was formed in August 1985 by seven promi-</p><p>nent rare coin dealers for the purpose of providing a consistent,</p><p>impartial, "certified" coin grading service upon which purchasers</p><p>and sellers of rare coins could depend. For a fee of approximately</p><p>$25 to $100 per coin, PCGS claimed that a coin would be impartially</p><p>and accurately graded by several of "the world's top grading</p><p>experts."</p><p><br /></p><p> According to the complaint accompanying the consent decree,</p><p>PCGS falsely represented that its grading system is objective, con-</p><p>sistent, and unbiased; that an investment in PCGS coins eliminates</p><p>the risk associated with the grading of coins; that its coins can</p><p>be liquidated easily at reasonable, competitive prices; and that</p><p>it observes a "strict anti-self interest policy." </p><p><br /></p><p> In fact, the complaint charges, PCGS has not provided object-</p><p>ive or consistent grading, and coin grading involves a certain</p><p>amount of subjectivity. Not all PCGS-certified coins can be li-</p><p>quidated easily at reasonable, competitive prices, according to</p><p>the complaint, and PCGS does not in all cases observe its "strict</p><p>anti-self interest policy." In addition, the complaint charges,</p><p>investment in PCGS-certified coins does not eliminate all the risk</p><p>associated with the grading of coins.</p><p><br /></p><p> (More)</p><p><br /></p><p> Under the terms of the consent decree, PCGS is subject to num-</p><p>erous prohibitions and requirements. PCGS is prohibited from mis-</p><p>representing that its grading is objective, consistent or unbiased,</p><p>or that an investment in PCGS-certified coins eliminates all risks</p><p>associated with the grading of coins. PCGS is also prohibited from</p><p>misrepresenting that PCGS-certified coins are liquid at reasonable,</p><p>competitive prices.</p><p><br /></p><p> In addition, for a period of two years, PCGS must disclose in</p><p>all of its advertising and promotional material that "Certification</p><p>by PCGS does not guarantee protection against the normal risks</p><p>associated with potentially volatile markets." The decree further</p><p>requires that any claims about the safety or security of an invest-</p><p>ment in PCGS-certified coins be accompanied by a clear and conspic-</p><p>uous disclosure that the rare coin market is highly speculative and</p><p>subject to risk. PCGS must also clarify its liquidity claims with</p><p>a disclosure that the degree of liquidity, and the availability of</p><p>markets for certain coins, will vary from time to time. </p><p><br /></p><p> The complaint and consent decree were filed in the U.S. Dis-</p><p>trict Court for the District of Columbia. </p><p><br /></p><p> Professional Coin Grading Service, Inc. is based in Santa Ana,</p><p>Calif. </p><p><br /></p><p> A consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not</p><p>constitute admission of a law violation. Consent decrees have the</p><p>force of law. </p><p><br /></p><p> Copies of the complaint and consent decree are available from</p><p>the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Room 130, 6th St. and Pennsyl-</p><p>vania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-326-2222; TTY 202-</p><p>326-2502.</p><p><br /></p><p> # # #</p><p><br /></p><p>MEDIA CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 202-326-2180</p><p><br /></p><p>STAFF CONTACT: Phoebe D. Morse, Boston Regional Office,</p><p> 617-565-7240</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>(Civil Action No. 90-1982)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>(PCGS)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="vavet, post: 353896, member: 11630"]It had "absolutely nothing to do with the grading of coins that PCGS was doing. It had only to do with advertising." Part of that bogus advertising (that is still being done in a vailed manner today) was that their grading was "consistent", "objective", "unbiased", and that they weren't grading their own coins. For the benefit of anyone interested, here's the rest of the story straight from the source. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 17, 1990 FTC CHARGES COIN CERTIFICATION CO. MISREPRESENTS OBJECTIVITY OF ITS COIN GRADING SERVICES; COMPANY AGREES TO SETTLEMENT The Federal Trade Commission has charged that Professional Coin Grading Service, Inc. ("PCGS") misled consumers by falsely claiming that it provides consistent, objective grading of coins and that investment in PCGS-certified rare coins eliminates all the risk associated with the grading of coins. Under a consent decree filed August 16 in federal district court, PCGS is prohibit- ed from making false representations about its objectivity, con- sistency, or the liquidity of its coins, and from making deceptive statements about the risks of investing in graded coins. According to the FTC's Boston Regional Office, which handled the investigation, PCGS was formed in August 1985 by seven promi- nent rare coin dealers for the purpose of providing a consistent, impartial, "certified" coin grading service upon which purchasers and sellers of rare coins could depend. For a fee of approximately $25 to $100 per coin, PCGS claimed that a coin would be impartially and accurately graded by several of "the world's top grading experts." According to the complaint accompanying the consent decree, PCGS falsely represented that its grading system is objective, con- sistent, and unbiased; that an investment in PCGS coins eliminates the risk associated with the grading of coins; that its coins can be liquidated easily at reasonable, competitive prices; and that it observes a "strict anti-self interest policy." In fact, the complaint charges, PCGS has not provided object- ive or consistent grading, and coin grading involves a certain amount of subjectivity. Not all PCGS-certified coins can be li- quidated easily at reasonable, competitive prices, according to the complaint, and PCGS does not in all cases observe its "strict anti-self interest policy." In addition, the complaint charges, investment in PCGS-certified coins does not eliminate all the risk associated with the grading of coins. (More) Under the terms of the consent decree, PCGS is subject to num- erous prohibitions and requirements. PCGS is prohibited from mis- representing that its grading is objective, consistent or unbiased, or that an investment in PCGS-certified coins eliminates all risks associated with the grading of coins. PCGS is also prohibited from misrepresenting that PCGS-certified coins are liquid at reasonable, competitive prices. In addition, for a period of two years, PCGS must disclose in all of its advertising and promotional material that "Certification by PCGS does not guarantee protection against the normal risks associated with potentially volatile markets." The decree further requires that any claims about the safety or security of an invest- ment in PCGS-certified coins be accompanied by a clear and conspic- uous disclosure that the rare coin market is highly speculative and subject to risk. PCGS must also clarify its liquidity claims with a disclosure that the degree of liquidity, and the availability of markets for certain coins, will vary from time to time. The complaint and consent decree were filed in the U.S. Dis- trict Court for the District of Columbia. Professional Coin Grading Service, Inc. is based in Santa Ana, Calif. A consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute admission of a law violation. Consent decrees have the force of law. Copies of the complaint and consent decree are available from the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Room 130, 6th St. and Pennsyl- vania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-326-2222; TTY 202- 326-2502. # # # MEDIA CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 202-326-2180 STAFF CONTACT: Phoebe D. Morse, Boston Regional Office, 617-565-7240 (Civil Action No. 90-1982) (PCGS)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical grading vs Market grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...