Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical grading vs Market grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="srkjkd, post: 351954, member: 7248"]good post. great reading! when i returned to collecting coins a few yrs ago...this really threw me off. i had taken ana courses in 1983 and my thinking was in light of those yrs. i had always been taught that technical grading was that all coins were created equal and that the merits of coin grading was simply the amt of wear and contact marks, ect. which the coin had incurred over its life. strike was not a factor taken into acct. it was up to the collector to pick up the subtleties in comparing coins. if a coin had a certain amt of wear and marks, ect..to be graded, for example,xf., then it was an xf coin even if the strike was weak.</p><p> i still have a habit of viewing the coin technically to give it a grade. even if it was "prettier" than another coin of same grade, i would not bump it to au. to me, it was still an xf coin due to wear and marks and it was up to me to find a specimen which was nicer . market grading would bump a pretty coin even tho, technically it was the same . i still have the same feeling and it is simply up to me as a collector, to find the nicest coin for my collection which meets technical standards of a given grade but with the bonus of it just being a nicer strike, more luster, ect. </p><p> i simply believe that every single collector needs to be able to grade and set standards for his or her own collection rather than rely on what a holder (whether a 2x2 or a tpg graded coin) says. after all, in the end, it is your money and your opinion on what a coin is worth to you, regardless of what grade you want to call it. </p><p> you, as the collector, are the one who ultimately lives with the coin and it comes down to trading money for a given item. you have to decide what it is worth to you. my coin collecting is done for fun and recreation but i still want the best coin i can get (in my own opinion) for the money i trade for it. its nice to look thru your collection and be happy w/ the coins you have rather than the holders or stickers someone else puts on them.</p><p> hope my opinion makes some sense...i still feel somewhat like a dinosaur in the numismatic world (and not just due to my age!!)...once again...great post. i really appreciate it when great numismatic minds like doug and bone (as well as others), share thier knowledge. you are doing so many collectors a huge favor when they can learn from you. </p><p> may God bless you all.....steve[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="srkjkd, post: 351954, member: 7248"]good post. great reading! when i returned to collecting coins a few yrs ago...this really threw me off. i had taken ana courses in 1983 and my thinking was in light of those yrs. i had always been taught that technical grading was that all coins were created equal and that the merits of coin grading was simply the amt of wear and contact marks, ect. which the coin had incurred over its life. strike was not a factor taken into acct. it was up to the collector to pick up the subtleties in comparing coins. if a coin had a certain amt of wear and marks, ect..to be graded, for example,xf., then it was an xf coin even if the strike was weak. i still have a habit of viewing the coin technically to give it a grade. even if it was "prettier" than another coin of same grade, i would not bump it to au. to me, it was still an xf coin due to wear and marks and it was up to me to find a specimen which was nicer . market grading would bump a pretty coin even tho, technically it was the same . i still have the same feeling and it is simply up to me as a collector, to find the nicest coin for my collection which meets technical standards of a given grade but with the bonus of it just being a nicer strike, more luster, ect. i simply believe that every single collector needs to be able to grade and set standards for his or her own collection rather than rely on what a holder (whether a 2x2 or a tpg graded coin) says. after all, in the end, it is your money and your opinion on what a coin is worth to you, regardless of what grade you want to call it. you, as the collector, are the one who ultimately lives with the coin and it comes down to trading money for a given item. you have to decide what it is worth to you. my coin collecting is done for fun and recreation but i still want the best coin i can get (in my own opinion) for the money i trade for it. its nice to look thru your collection and be happy w/ the coins you have rather than the holders or stickers someone else puts on them. hope my opinion makes some sense...i still feel somewhat like a dinosaur in the numismatic world (and not just due to my age!!)...once again...great post. i really appreciate it when great numismatic minds like doug and bone (as well as others), share thier knowledge. you are doing so many collectors a huge favor when they can learn from you. may God bless you all.....steve[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Technical grading vs Market grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...