Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Sean5150, post: 2599175, member: 75607"]That's what I thought, it's kind of an extreme contrast of beauty and ugliness. But you think the technical grade would be damaged? Or is that the market grade? That's why I posted this; it's a dichotomy of surface preservation. The fields and most of the cheek are a 66, and the one big hit is a details/60/? So how is a technical grade determined? What is the line between "hits" and "damage". Did we find it here? Have you seen some 1878 CCs? I guess one thing that's obvious is that it's not market acceptable. Or is it?[/QUOTE]