Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TIF, post: 3137309, member: 56859&quot;]I might be wrong about the Callatay die number.&nbsp; When I was researching the coin a few years ago I thought it was from 99/8 BCE instead of 100/99.&nbsp; I&#039;ll have to dig through my notes and bookmarks to look at it again.&nbsp; But yes-- they are obverse die matches.</p><p><br /></p><p>Edited:</p><p><br /></p><p>Oh, I remember the problem now.&nbsp; The year in BCE terms was different by one in Callatay&#039;s article compared to others I saw in archives. It was confusing and eventually I gave up and copied an attribution from a recent CNG sale <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie10" alt=":oops:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.&nbsp; The obverse die number per Callatay&#039;s study is correct, D16.</p><p><br /></p><p>From <i>La production des tetradrachmes civiques de la Cilicie jusqu&#039; a la Palestine a la fin du He et dans la premiere moitie du r s. ay. J.-C. (Elaiussa Sebaste, Aigeai, Seleucie-de-Pierie, Laodicee, Arados, Tripolis, Sidon, Tyr, Ascalon)</i> , Fr. De Callatay</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]801327[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in