Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
syntethic toning
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="eddiespin, post: 427544, member: 4920"]The pendulum swings both ways, Lehigh. It could also be these toned Morgans haven't yet reached their <i>saturation point</i>. Not saying they're bell bottom jeans and platform shoes, but that we don't <i>know </i>that, yet. Give it time. Five years or so ago I saw the <i>ugliest </i>toned Franklin half on Heritage NGC-graded upper gem (67/68, I don't remember exactly), FBL. You couldn't even see any of the details in any of the critical areas for the "toning" (...or, if you could, it was <i>very </i>difficult). Today that <i>negative </i>toning would <i>subtract </i>from the technical grade; but, just five years ago, it was considered <i>irrelevant</i> to the grade, a wash. Today, toning is in more <i>solid </i>with these TPGs as a grading checkpoint, and hardly just icing on the cake, anymore. </p><p><br /></p><p>Again, just saying we don't <i>know</i>. Your position is supportable. The opposing position is just as supportable. All anybody can definitively say is we'll get closer to the answer as time goes along. Just my buck three-eighty...don't get all worked up and in attack mode. I love your collection. I told you it wasn't my taste, but I think it's a <i>very </i>enviable, if not...given the market conditions, today...<i>valuable </i>one. But this market on these "toners" is too young to forecast, as yet; and that's my position, here, in a nutshell.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="eddiespin, post: 427544, member: 4920"]The pendulum swings both ways, Lehigh. It could also be these toned Morgans haven't yet reached their [I]saturation point[/I]. Not saying they're bell bottom jeans and platform shoes, but that we don't [I]know [/I]that, yet. Give it time. Five years or so ago I saw the [I]ugliest [/I]toned Franklin half on Heritage NGC-graded upper gem (67/68, I don't remember exactly), FBL. You couldn't even see any of the details in any of the critical areas for the "toning" (...or, if you could, it was [I]very [/I]difficult). Today that [I]negative [/I]toning would [I]subtract [/I]from the technical grade; but, just five years ago, it was considered [I]irrelevant[/I] to the grade, a wash. Today, toning is in more [I]solid [/I]with these TPGs as a grading checkpoint, and hardly just icing on the cake, anymore. Again, just saying we don't [I]know[/I]. Your position is supportable. The opposing position is just as supportable. All anybody can definitively say is we'll get closer to the answer as time goes along. Just my buck three-eighty...don't get all worked up and in attack mode. I love your collection. I told you it wasn't my taste, but I think it's a [I]very [/I]enviable, if not...given the market conditions, today...[I]valuable [/I]one. But this market on these "toners" is too young to forecast, as yet; and that's my position, here, in a nutshell.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
syntethic toning
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...