Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 427425, member: 4920&quot;]That&#039;s fine. I didn&#039;t just join here, yesterday, Doug. I&#039;m aware you call a tight strike zone.</p><p><br /></p><p>Toned Morgans <i>are </i>going crazy, though. That&#039;s why I think a common date Lincoln wheat (and, you can&#039;t get much more &quot;common&quot; than a &#039;58-D) might be an interesting change for us, perhaps even somewhat of a learning experience. After all, the strike zone is the same size for all hitters...from the knees to the pits. Thus, we have to go by the same rules, apply the same principles, for all hitters, regardless of size.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just one other thing. I know a little bit about the Lincoln &quot;technical&quot; criteria...the wheat heads, wheat stalks, hair, cheek and jaw, bow tie, not too many nicks and it would be nice if the luster shined and did acrobatics and wasn&#039;t flat or dull...but, beyond that simple criteria, I&#039;m pretty much lost on these. So, I step into the batter&#039;s box with this, tomorrow, and I&#039;m going to be keeping both ears open, trying to understand. </p><p><br /></p><p>OK. Not going to attempt to bias the umpires any further, tonight. &#039;Till game time, logging off. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in