Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Volodya, post: 2445676, member: 19615&quot;]That&#039;s a longer explanation than I can really deal with now. Several lines of argument lead to that conclusion. Most significantly, for other reasons it&#039;s clear (at least to me!) that the 367/1 legend configuration is the beginning of a distinct subset of this issue, so no. I fits nicely. The highest number recorded is XXX (and that reading isn&#039;t entirely certain) so a &quot;jump&quot; to 50 seems unlikely. Some of the other numerals are clearly barred and can&#039;t be mistaken for a letter or another number, so I&#039;m reasonably confident that&#039;s what&#039;s going on here.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in