Incredible posts everyone!!! I just got back on-line and I'm a bit surprised (a bit?) that so many posted so many variations of devices and styles...and now I've lost track of what may be missing on this thread and what I still have in my collection.... Well. I'll look a bit and see what I still can do. Bing's right: Too many of you are chasing RR coins LOL
Here are a few that I think haven't been shown yet. M. Plaetorius M F Cestianus Bon Jovus Eventus / Winged Electric Guitar L. Plaetorius L. f. Cestianus Moneta / Boxer taking a victory lap Q. Crepereius M. f. Rocus Amphitrite / Neptune in biga of hippocamps
Here's two Roman Republic denarii I recently purchased, thanks for the opportunity to show them off C. Vibius C.f. Pansa 90 BC AR denarius (19.5 mm, 4.06 g, 11 h) Obv: Minerva, holding spear, reins, and trophy, driving galloping quadriga left, PANSA in ex. Rev: Minerva, holding reins and spear, driving quadriga right, C·VIBIVS·CF in ex. Ref: Crawford 342/6a, Syd 687 Man. Aemilius Lepidus 114-113 BC AR denarius 4.11 gm - 19 mm Obv: Laureate and diad. head of Roma right, * (XVI monogram) behind, ROMA (MA in monogram) before. Rev: MN AEMILIO (MN in monogram), equestian statue r. on triumphial arch, the horseman holding spear, on base formed by triple-arch containing L-E-P. Ref: Crawford 291/1, Syd 554
Fabulous posts everyone!!! And some people think RR denarii are boring ?? Obviously there are 'tons' of examples that do not simply repeat the Roma/Chariot theme. I think I have another that hasn't been posted: Manius Acilius Glabrio, 49 BC; Salus and Valetudo (Health), RIC 442.
A few others I do not think have been shown yet... Q. Fufius Calenus & Mucius Cordus 70 BC AR denarius 3.59g - 19 mm Obv: Jugate heads of Honos and Virtus, labeled HO and VIRT respectively, KALENI below. Rev: Italia (ITAL) clasping hands with Roma (RO), CORDI in exergue. Ref: Crawford 403/1, Syd 797 L. Lucretius Trio 76 BC AR denarius 3.78 gm - 18 mm Obv: Radiate head of Sol r., X below chin. Rev: Crescent moon surrounded by seven starrs, L LVCRETI below, TRIO above Ref: Crawford 390/1, Syd 788
JULIUS CAESAR AR Denarius OBVERSE: COS.TERT.DICT.ITER. Head of Ceres right REVERSE: / AVGVR above, PONT.MAX. below. Simpulum, sprinkler, capis and lituus; M in right field Utica 46 BC 2.7g, 17mm Syd 1024; Crawford 467/1b
L.CORNELIUS LENTULUE & C.CLAUDIUS MARCELLUS ROMAN REPUBLIC; GENS CORNELIA AR Denarius OBVERSE: Facing head of Medusa in center of triskeles, ear of corn between each leg REVERSE: Jupiter standing right, holding thunderbolt and eagle; LENT MAR to left, COS to right Rome 49 BC 3.08g, 18-16mm Crawford 445/1b; Sear 4; Sydenham 1029; Cornelia 64a
MN. AUILLIUS ROMAN REPUBLIC; GENS AQUILLIA AR Denarius OBVERSE: VIRTVS III VIR ; Helmeted bust of Virtus right. REVERSE: MN AQVIL M N F MN N SICIL in ex.; The consul Man. Aquillius raising Sicilia Rome 71 BC 3.3g, 19mm RSC/Aquillia-2, SYD-798
I give that big thumbs up for the photo alone. I don't care what it looks like in real life because the photo itself is fantastic. IMO it stops being a photo of a coin and becomes artwork, when you pull off a shot like that.
Crawford was the first to notice that a few denarii struck for Sulla by L Manlius Torquatus have numbered reverse dies. He knew of coins bearing VI, IX, XV and XX. I've been able to add a fair number of additional dies, including my discovery of control no. I, which, significantly is combined with Crawford 367/1, a very rare legend configuration in which the L M of the moneyer's name appears behind the head of Roma. Eventually I'll get around to posting on this topic in depth; it's something I've done a lot of research on. For now, here's my control no. I discovery piece. The I is barred; it's the hatchet-like object behind the standing figure--presumably Sulla himself--in the left reverse field:
That's a longer explanation than I can really deal with now. Several lines of argument lead to that conclusion. Most significantly, for other reasons it's clear (at least to me!) that the 367/1 legend configuration is the beginning of a distinct subset of this issue, so no. I fits nicely. The highest number recorded is XXX (and that reading isn't entirely certain) so a "jump" to 50 seems unlikely. Some of the other numerals are clearly barred and can't be mistaken for a letter or another number, so I'm reasonably confident that's what's going on here.