Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Superior Grades - My Opinion
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="rick, post: 68945, member: 1235"]</p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Now that I have had time to gather myself in the hobby, and test the waters of many various outlets, I have found that (for my money) the best grades range between VF and AU - Specifically, XF (or EF). I have a few reasons for this:</font></font></p><p> </p><p><br /></p><ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Lower grades usually carry enough wear that you can no longer fully appreciate the craftsmanship or artistic nature originally intended to be seen in the details.</font></font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">To me, uncirculated grades (or the various states of mint) seem to me like a classic car that has never had a mile on the odometer. Sure, it looks nice, but it’s never been used for the purpose it was created for. I know that UNC. is a technical grade, and not a true definition of circulation – but I like to know the coins in my collection have been held, and hopefully for the purpose the were intended for.</font></font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Price. Pretty simple. Prices tend to rise at an exponential rate once a coin reaches MS 63 and beyond. Often times, you can afford three, four, or ten coins in XF for the same price as one coin that has been determined, for example, MS 67.</font></font></li> </ul><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">When I purchase a coin in a decent grade of XF, I know I will never suffer from the drawback of ‘upgrading’. I will always be happy with its condition, and proud to display it with my other pieces. This might be different if I collected modern dates, but I don’t. I think that better grades of circulation strike a perfect bargain between the problems I see in #1 and 2.</font></font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">There are, of course, exceptions to this rule, on a case by case basis. Collectors of modern commemoratives, for example, don't have to worry about #2, because there's a good chance the coin was never intended for circulation to begin with. On the other hand, for collectors of key date issues would find an enormous price gap between lower grades of circulation and those higher, and a VG example may be enough to satisfy the need to own the piece itself. But, in my opinion, for what I collect. Nothing beats XF.</font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Personal opinion, of course!</font> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="rick, post: 68945, member: 1235"][size=3][/size] [font=Times New Roman][size=3]Now that I have had time to gather myself in the hobby, and test the waters of many various outlets, I have found that (for my money) the best grades range between VF and AU - Specifically, XF (or EF). I have a few reasons for this:[/size][/font] [size=3][/size] [list] [*][font=Times New Roman][size=3]Lower grades usually carry enough wear that you can no longer fully appreciate the craftsmanship or artistic nature originally intended to be seen in the details.[/size][/font] [*][font=Times New Roman][size=3]To me, uncirculated grades (or the various states of mint) seem to me like a classic car that has never had a mile on the odometer. Sure, it looks nice, but it’s never been used for the purpose it was created for. I know that UNC. is a technical grade, and not a true definition of circulation – but I like to know the coins in my collection have been held, and hopefully for the purpose the were intended for.[/size][/font] [*][font=Times New Roman][size=3]Price. Pretty simple. Prices tend to rise at an exponential rate once a coin reaches MS 63 and beyond. Often times, you can afford three, four, or ten coins in XF for the same price as one coin that has been determined, for example, MS 67.[/size][/font] [/list][size=3][/size] [font=Times New Roman][size=3]When I purchase a coin in a decent grade of XF, I know I will never suffer from the drawback of ‘upgrading’. I will always be happy with its condition, and proud to display it with my other pieces. This might be different if I collected modern dates, but I don’t. I think that better grades of circulation strike a perfect bargain between the problems I see in #1 and 2.[/size][/font][size=3][/size] [font=Times New Roman][size=3]There are, of course, exceptions to this rule, on a case by case basis. Collectors of modern commemoratives, for example, don't have to worry about #2, because there's a good chance the coin was never intended for circulation to begin with. On the other hand, for collectors of key date issues would find an enormous price gap between lower grades of circulation and those higher, and a VG example may be enough to satisfy the need to own the piece itself. But, in my opinion, for what I collect. Nothing beats XF.[/size][/font] [size=3][/size] [font=Times New Roman][size=3]Personal opinion, of course![/size] :p [/font][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Superior Grades - My Opinion
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...