Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Super group of British Halfcrowns and others
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="PaddyB, post: 1637519, member: 40017"]A few more notes on these before I go out for the evening:</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1703 Sixpence with the portrait of Queen Anne, and the word Vigo beneath. This celebrates the British Naval victory of Vigo Bay in 1702 when the French and Spanish suffered severe losses. It is often reported that the coins were made from the captured silver, but in fact teh Master of the Mint (no lesser person than Sir Isaac Newton) reported that only about 2 tons of silver were actually handed in. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vigo_Bay" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vigo_Bay" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vigo_Bay</a> for more info.</p><p><br /></p><p>The E below Queen Anne's bust on the 1707 halfcrown is for Edinburgh. Although England and Scotland had "unified" in 1705, coins were still being minted in Edinburgh.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1572 Elizabeth I sixpence is one in a long series of issues and variations that make these coins very complex. I find it interesting that at this time they are introducing the Arabic numeral dates we know today (although not all the time) and also still using the much older mintmark approach to dating. This coin has the mintmark "Ermine" which conveniently also gives us the 1572 date.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1731 halfcrown has the "Roses and Plumes" reverse which is one of the more common. Throughout the 18th century there were numerous combinations of Roses, plumes, roses & plumes, plain, and occasionally "SSC" (for South Sea Company) and "WCC" (For Welsh Copper Company) - so collecting these gives huge scope for varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Charles I Sixpence is not in great condition, but does at least have a decent portrait, which is usually the first detail to go on these coins. This one dates from between 1636 and 1638 from the mintmark (tun). It is Group D type 3a - which alone gives you some idea of the complexity of these coins. It got worse as we descended into Civil War, and coins were minted at numerous local mints, and even in besieged towns - another huge topic!</p><p><br /></p><p>I hope to post another group from this lot tomorrow, so keep watching.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="PaddyB, post: 1637519, member: 40017"]A few more notes on these before I go out for the evening: The 1703 Sixpence with the portrait of Queen Anne, and the word Vigo beneath. This celebrates the British Naval victory of Vigo Bay in 1702 when the French and Spanish suffered severe losses. It is often reported that the coins were made from the captured silver, but in fact teh Master of the Mint (no lesser person than Sir Isaac Newton) reported that only about 2 tons of silver were actually handed in. See [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vigo_Bay[/url] for more info. The E below Queen Anne's bust on the 1707 halfcrown is for Edinburgh. Although England and Scotland had "unified" in 1705, coins were still being minted in Edinburgh. The 1572 Elizabeth I sixpence is one in a long series of issues and variations that make these coins very complex. I find it interesting that at this time they are introducing the Arabic numeral dates we know today (although not all the time) and also still using the much older mintmark approach to dating. This coin has the mintmark "Ermine" which conveniently also gives us the 1572 date. The 1731 halfcrown has the "Roses and Plumes" reverse which is one of the more common. Throughout the 18th century there were numerous combinations of Roses, plumes, roses & plumes, plain, and occasionally "SSC" (for South Sea Company) and "WCC" (For Welsh Copper Company) - so collecting these gives huge scope for varieties. The Charles I Sixpence is not in great condition, but does at least have a decent portrait, which is usually the first detail to go on these coins. This one dates from between 1636 and 1638 from the mintmark (tun). It is Group D type 3a - which alone gives you some idea of the complexity of these coins. It got worse as we descended into Civil War, and coins were minted at numerous local mints, and even in besieged towns - another huge topic! I hope to post another group from this lot tomorrow, so keep watching.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Super group of British Halfcrowns and others
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...