Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 2236998, member: 56653&quot;]On a parallel issue for Crispus who was also consul in 321, the titulature is as expected N C COS II. I think the fact that Constantine Jr lacks the title on the legend of his issues is most likely due to the fact that the die cutters could not fit those 2 letters on the die without giving up on those stylish dots that separate the words on the obv. legend.</p><p>As for CONS instead of COS, it&#039;s also the norm for Maxentius and his dedications to his son Romulus. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, on the topic of consular legends, with a twist, here&#039;s one of my earlier posts about Constantine&#039;s 4th Consulship in 315: <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/incredible-lrb-dated-consular-constantine-i.266854/#post-2204725" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/incredible-lrb-dated-consular-constantine-i.266854/#post-2204725">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/incredible-lrb-dated-consular-constantine-i.266854/#post-2204725</a></p><p><br /></p><p>And as bonus, an incredible Tacits with IMP C M CL TACITVS P F AVG P M TR P COS III obv. legend:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]440620[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in