Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 18859521, member: 15199&quot;]I do hope no one took it as being a &quot;put-down&quot;, its really that I hate to see members believing &quot;selling crud statements &quot; to be scientific fact.&nbsp; Very few have had&nbsp; experience to understand how magnifiers from the toys to current levels have evolved. Why a earlier Leica camera or microscope cost thousands but a Bell and Howell or Kodak brand less than $100. </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; When the digital era came in with cameras and phones. and all the rest of instruments, it was a huge step. Leading cell phones today have much , much better than the electron microscope of college ( circa 1960s) years, and electron microscopes today are possible at&nbsp; the molecule level. It is Fantastic to observe molecule shapes today. Modern Vaccines are now based on info from such observations of viruses/antibodies or antigen/antibody configurations, so that children who before, might have died from defective antibody production or sickle cell anemia, today can use a human made molecules to allow them to survive as they should. It is( insert exclamatory words) amazing! </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Anyway if any one felt I was putting their equipment or photos down, I apologize, but I hate to see possible misleading/misunderstood advertising ( such as X1000). </p><p>Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in