Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Struck under Carausius but not in his name
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Conduitt, post: 8322030, member: 109923"]I don't know about blow away as yours are pretty good (and Camulodunum isn't too common), but I have a couple of these from London. Ironically, they were some of my first Roman coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>AVGGG, of course, has 3Gs to represent 3 Augusti (Carausius, Diocletian and Maximian), as if they were all happily ruling together.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe there's still some dispute as to whether the C mint was Camulodunum (Colchester). Indeed, it probably was not, based on find spots and the contraction CL found in exergue on some Allectus coins. Instead, it might be Clausentum (modern Southampton).</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Carausius for Diocletian Antoninianus, 287-293</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1474264[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>London. Bronze, 4.3g. Radiate and draped bust right; IMP C DIOCLETIANVS P F AVG. Pax standing left holding olive-branch and transverse sceptre; PAX AVGGG; S - P in fields; mintmark MLXXI in exergue (RIC V, 9).</b></p><p><br /></p><p><b>Carausius for Maximian Antoninianus, 287-293</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1474262[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>London. Bronze, 22mm, 4.3g. Radiate and cuirassed bust right; IMP C MAXIMIANVS PF AVG. Pax standing left, holding olive branch and long scepter; PAX AVGGG; S-P across fields; mintmark MLXXI in exergue (RIC V, 34).</b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Conduitt, post: 8322030, member: 109923"]I don't know about blow away as yours are pretty good (and Camulodunum isn't too common), but I have a couple of these from London. Ironically, they were some of my first Roman coins. AVGGG, of course, has 3Gs to represent 3 Augusti (Carausius, Diocletian and Maximian), as if they were all happily ruling together. I believe there's still some dispute as to whether the C mint was Camulodunum (Colchester). Indeed, it probably was not, based on find spots and the contraction CL found in exergue on some Allectus coins. Instead, it might be Clausentum (modern Southampton). [B]Carausius for Diocletian Antoninianus, 287-293[/B] [ATTACH=full]1474264[/ATTACH] [B]London. Bronze, 4.3g. Radiate and draped bust right; IMP C DIOCLETIANVS P F AVG. Pax standing left holding olive-branch and transverse sceptre; PAX AVGGG; S - P in fields; mintmark MLXXI in exergue (RIC V, 9).[/B] [B]Carausius for Maximian Antoninianus, 287-293[/B] [ATTACH=full]1474262[/ATTACH] [B]London. Bronze, 22mm, 4.3g. Radiate and cuirassed bust right; IMP C MAXIMIANVS PF AVG. Pax standing left, holding olive branch and long scepter; PAX AVGGG; S-P across fields; mintmark MLXXI in exergue (RIC V, 34).[/B][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Struck under Carausius but not in his name
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...