Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Struck too hard - Constans II
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 2446181, member: 44316"]My Sear Byzantine 1109 of Constans II is one of those hard-to-decipher overstrikes with signs of three strikes on the obverse. The last strike show two emperors standing side by side, with the smaller on the right. The corresponding reverse is clear, so it is Sear 1109 from SCL (Sicily). But, on the obverse it is easy to see a much larger head (top at 12:30) of an undertype, DO 178, SB1007, and also at 10:00 the SCL of the reverse of a previous strike, possibly also DO 178, SB1007, or maybe this same type, SB 1109, but the reverse (as a flip strike) and perhaps the right vertical of the M (at 7:00 to 9:00 in this orientation). </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]510640[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510641[/ATTACH] </p><p>Byzantine copper is usually struck with 6:00 die-axis, so if you can see part of an undertype on one side, rotate it to 6:00 and look for signs of the corresponding undertype on the other side. With this reverse there is not much to see except the + above the monogram which does not belong there. </p><p><br /></p><p>I do not know why Constans II overstruck his own types (these differ in Sear by only two numbers). Perhaps it is because the earlier was as sole emperor and when he elevated Constantine IV (654) it was decided a new obverse with both emperors should replace the single-emperor obverses.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 2446181, member: 44316"]My Sear Byzantine 1109 of Constans II is one of those hard-to-decipher overstrikes with signs of three strikes on the obverse. The last strike show two emperors standing side by side, with the smaller on the right. The corresponding reverse is clear, so it is Sear 1109 from SCL (Sicily). But, on the obverse it is easy to see a much larger head (top at 12:30) of an undertype, DO 178, SB1007, and also at 10:00 the SCL of the reverse of a previous strike, possibly also DO 178, SB1007, or maybe this same type, SB 1109, but the reverse (as a flip strike) and perhaps the right vertical of the M (at 7:00 to 9:00 in this orientation). [ATTACH=full]510640[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]510641[/ATTACH] Byzantine copper is usually struck with 6:00 die-axis, so if you can see part of an undertype on one side, rotate it to 6:00 and look for signs of the corresponding undertype on the other side. With this reverse there is not much to see except the + above the monogram which does not belong there. I do not know why Constans II overstruck his own types (these differ in Sear by only two numbers). Perhaps it is because the earlier was as sole emperor and when he elevated Constantine IV (654) it was decided a new obverse with both emperors should replace the single-emperor obverses.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Struck too hard - Constans II
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...