Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Strike
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2192743, member: 112"]Yes luster can be a good indicator with coins of lower grades. XF coins often have some remaining luster, but coins graded lower than that rarely do, except maybe in a few protected areas. And you don't even find that very often.</p><p><br /></p><p>But with coins grading AU and up luster is not the answer to determining weak strike from wear. That is because weakly struck areas such as the high points on hair curls for example, have no luster. Similarly, areas with wear or even light wear also have no luster. So how do you reliably tell one from the other ?</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a way, but few employ it, choosing instead to automatically assume that a coin is weakly struck. This is a mistake of course for you can't just assume anything, especially not when it could just as easily be something entirely different. You need to know, not assume, in order to correctly grade a coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>The way, the method, to tell a weak strike from wear is more simple than most realize. And there are two separate determining factors. One is color. Weakly struck areas will be a darker shade of grey than adjoining areas that have luster. And areas that have wear will be an even slightly darker grey than that. To correctly recognize these color differences when you see them requires a certain level of experience.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second determining factor to tell weak strike from wear on a given area of a coin is texture, and this is much easier to see, provided you look for it. Magnification is usually needed to see it. A weakly struck are will have a texture to it, it will be slightly rough, you might even describe it as slightly bumpy when viewed with magnification. But an area with wear, even slight wear, will have no texture. It will be smooth and sometimes even flat. This because it is the nature of wear to flatten out a surface and remove any texture. Luster after all is itself in fact a form of texture. And it is the lack of this texture that makes breaks in luster so easy to see.</p><p><br /></p><p>So when presented with the question, is it wear or is it weak strike, that's how you answer the question for yourself, definitively. Even if that answer is contradictory to the opinion of others. This method removes all assumption.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2192743, member: 112"]Yes luster can be a good indicator with coins of lower grades. XF coins often have some remaining luster, but coins graded lower than that rarely do, except maybe in a few protected areas. And you don't even find that very often. But with coins grading AU and up luster is not the answer to determining weak strike from wear. That is because weakly struck areas such as the high points on hair curls for example, have no luster. Similarly, areas with wear or even light wear also have no luster. So how do you reliably tell one from the other ? There is a way, but few employ it, choosing instead to automatically assume that a coin is weakly struck. This is a mistake of course for you can't just assume anything, especially not when it could just as easily be something entirely different. You need to know, not assume, in order to correctly grade a coin. The way, the method, to tell a weak strike from wear is more simple than most realize. And there are two separate determining factors. One is color. Weakly struck areas will be a darker shade of grey than adjoining areas that have luster. And areas that have wear will be an even slightly darker grey than that. To correctly recognize these color differences when you see them requires a certain level of experience. The second determining factor to tell weak strike from wear on a given area of a coin is texture, and this is much easier to see, provided you look for it. Magnification is usually needed to see it. A weakly struck are will have a texture to it, it will be slightly rough, you might even describe it as slightly bumpy when viewed with magnification. But an area with wear, even slight wear, will have no texture. It will be smooth and sometimes even flat. This because it is the nature of wear to flatten out a surface and remove any texture. Luster after all is itself in fact a form of texture. And it is the lack of this texture that makes breaks in luster so easy to see. So when presented with the question, is it wear or is it weak strike, that's how you answer the question for yourself, definitively. Even if that answer is contradictory to the opinion of others. This method removes all assumption.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Strike
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...