Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MEC2, post: 1945465, member: 38692&quot;]Typical - great find... really adds information.</p><p><br /></p><p>Funkee -</p><p><br /></p><p>Posted this at PCGS too...something is rotten in the milk here. I sense insurance fraud on part of the seller. Looking at the site Typical found it is clear the auction image is a crop job of the picture in the holder from the site, as the background smudges are identical. There is no way someone leaves $1k+ on the table since a 55 would CLEARLY demand another $1k price premium. If a deal is too good to be true... </p><p><br /></p><p>The fact he used the scan of the note in the holder from the other site, then says it is &quot;not in a holder&quot; in the auction, screams funny business to me. Seller clearly knew the holdered history, posted a scan taken of it in a holder, but says... no holder.</p><p><br /></p><p>The sloppy repackaging shouts &quot;here here look at my clearly tampered with package&quot;. Anything more subtle might not get the point across that it was a smash and grab... almost an orgy of tampering evidence.</p><p><br /></p><p>This stinks to me. Sorry you got caught up in it and didn&#039;t get that note I *know* you had to be looking forward to. But my gut tells me... it was never in that package.</p><p><br /></p><p>MEC2[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in