Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mr. Flute, post: 1563988, member: 33154&quot;]Premature wear on the date. </p><p><br /></p><p>Prior to the date being placed in a recessed field in 1925, the date on the SLQs would wear away more quickly, which likely results in a lower survival rate than the much lower mintage 1927-S. Additionally, there is also the factor that the SLQ was only minted in 1921 in Philly and no SLQs were minted in 1922. Therefore, the 1921 (with a mintage of about 1.9 million) had to supply two years worth of quarter demand. </p><p><br /></p><p>The above is also likely the reason for the cost of the 1923-S SLQ as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in