Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 456064, member: 15309&quot;]I have no problem with the 1920-S costing more than the 1928-D.&nbsp; It does and it should.&nbsp; The non full head 20-S is $900 compared to $200 for the 28-D in MS63.&nbsp; So the price multiplier is 4.5X in non full head but jumps to 10X in FH when the populations (rarity) are actually closer.&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t make sense.&nbsp; IMO supply is about the same and so is demand.&nbsp; I can&#039;t believe that there are date collectors of SLQ&#039;s that collect non full head coins except when it comes time to fill the 1920-S spot, they must have a FH specimen.&nbsp; The number of date SLQ collectors is essentially fixed for all dates and I promise that nobody is buying the 20-S as a type coin.&nbsp; So if the demand is the same for FH examples of every date, then there is no reason that coins of similar rarity should have such a price difference.</p><p><br /></p><p>All I know is that I am glad that I am not a strike conscious collector.&nbsp; Give me all the non full head rainbow toned SLQ&#039;s at the discount please.&nbsp; My problem is I don&#039;t like MS63 20th century coins.&nbsp; I need gems.&nbsp; It is going to cost me plenty I think.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in