Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ValpoBeginner, post: 3116088, member: 77066&quot;]I&#039;d call it constructive criticism designed to promote personal growth within someone who has potential for great things but is blind to the ways others are seeing him, Ive received messages from other members about your behavior and you do, whether you realize it or no,t come off as confrontational, by out and out telling people that they are wrong.&nbsp; I&#039;m not saying you mean it as an attack, but there are better ways to express your beliefs, which in this case are not at all consistent with my experiece dealing with the policies and procedures outlined by the submission guidelines on the CACcoin.com downloadable submission form.&nbsp; You couldn&#039;t have looked at this in regard to FS Jeff 5c coins, otherwise you&#039;d know that they simply will return a slab ,designation or not, containing a Jefferson Nickel of any kind.&nbsp; Rather than wasting my time proving this to you right now, I propose a gentlemen&#039;s bet, not monetary at all, of an apology from one party or the other outlining the mistakes, either of us has realized we made in this dispute.</p><p><br /></p><p>You like baseball, correct?&nbsp; I happen to be a huge fan myself.&nbsp; So maybe the&nbsp; statement of apology should include the famous line from a man who went from the top of Baseball&#039;s highest position in the 80&#039;s to his having to issue a statement finding the evidence of his mistake to be &quot;candid, forthright, and truthful&quot; that he did in fact do what he was accused of, but he,he unlike my proposal here, was banned from baseball forever.</p><p><br /></p><p>But my proposal, if mutual terms are agreed upon, does offer a ban and is a far cry from having anyone like Bud Selig, having to preside over it.&nbsp; The following is my proposal:</p><p><br /></p><p>!st there would be in the form of a peremptory agreement entered into by both of us, prior to engaging in the non-fiduciary aforementioned gentlemen&#039;s agreement on posting in the general discussion forum a post entitled &quot;Sincere apology to the winner of the &quot;Pete Rose Peace Accord&quot;, by which we would not have even one term, and I Repeat not one term,&nbsp; legally binding, of course due to our controlling authority in this case the rules, terms and conditions of cointalk.com, but and in place of law we&#039;d be rather bound by honor,</p><p>not to or challenge each other in a disrespectful manner a post here&nbsp; from one one of us to another on these set of forums ever again.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of course we&nbsp; could disagree on matters of opinion, but matters o would in fact have to be proven by official links to policies, standards, and non-editorial opinions of even experts BEFORE any statement is posted in a polite manner indicating that one of us has become aware that the other has made a mistake of fact.</p><p><br /></p><p>Well that&#039;s really all I could come up with right now, let me know what you think, feel free to propose any revisions and then we might be able to peacefully carry on.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in