Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;gronnh20, post: 3126954, member: 73224&quot;]Not so fast.&nbsp; Looks like someone else with credentials disputes NGC&#039;s grade.&nbsp; Quote from the article.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p>“Second, all examples of this pattern were made on a normal toggle press so they would be ‘the natural product of the press.’ Since all ‘proof’ coins were made on a hydraulic medal press, the Hayes and candidate J-1989 cannot be proofs, except by extension of imagination.</p><p><br /></p><p>“My conclusions are that candidate J-1989 as illustrated and described by NGC is a newly identified example of Judd 1989, and it was deliberately struck on a normal toggle press and therefore not a “proof” example. (The Hayes coin is also not a ‘proof.’)” </p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe when someone grades it for a third time the label will be correct.&nbsp; Try sending it to ANACS on one of those specials they run.&nbsp; If they catch a local show with ANACS present then no shipping.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in