Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 15123391, member: 26302&quot;]That is where I am at with the discussion, most likely a crude barbarian copy. Even 300 years ago fakes were MUCH better done than this. Its so laughably crude a limes or barbarian issue seems much more likely. Look at all of the other limes issues and this piece has much more in common with them than real Roman coins. Sure, it might be from the third century. Sure, it could have circulated in some small remote towns based on gold value. But to say this &quot;proves&quot; some new emperor is a laughable conclusion by non-coin collecting scientists.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in